Automating ACMG Variant Classifications With BIAS-2015 v2.0.0: Algorithm Analysis and Benchmark Against the FDA-Approved eRepo Dataset
Eisenhart, C. E.; Brickey, R.; Nadon, B.; Mewton, J.; Bayat, V.
Show abstract
BackgroundIn 2015, the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), in collaboration with the Association of Molecular Pathologists (AMP), published guidelines for interpreting and classifying germline genomic variants. These guidelines defined five categories: benign, likely benign, uncertain significance, likely pathogenic, and pathogenic, with 28 criteria but no specific implementation algorithms. ResultsHere we present Bitscopic Interpreting ACMG Standards 2015 (BIAS-2015 v2.0.0), an open-source software that automates the classification of variants based on 19 ACMG criteria while enabling user-defined weighting and manual adjustments for clinical contexts. BIAS-2015 supports high-throughput classification via command line, along with a web-based GUI, enabling variant review, modification, and interactive curation. Using genomic data from the FDA-recognized ClinGen Evidence Repository (eRepo v2.2.0), we evaluated BIAS-2015s sensitivity, specificity, and F1 values with expert curation. BIAS-2015 demonstrated superior performance to InterVar, achieving a pathogenic sensitivity of 73.99% (vs. 64.31%), benign sensitivity of 80.23% (vs. 53.91%), and a 11x speed improvement, classifying 1,327 variants per second. ConclusionBIAS-2015 provides an accurate, scalable, and transparent ACMG classification framework. All code and the interactive variant curation platform are available on GitHub.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- AVADA Enables Automated Genetic Variant Curation Directly from the Full Text Literature 95%
- Informing Variant Assessment using Structured Evidence from Prior Classifications (PS1, PM5, and PVS1 Sequence Variant Interpretation Criteria) 95%
- Reducing Sanger Confirmation Testing through False Positive Prediction Algorithms 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- MetaRNN: Differentiating Rare Pathogenic and Rare Benign Missense SNVs and InDels Using Deep Learning 95%
- OncoGEMINI: Software for Investigating Tumor Variants From Multiple Biopsies With Integrated Cancer Annotations 94%
- varCADD: large sets of standing genetic variation enable genome-wide pathogenicity prediction 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evidence-based calibration of computational tools for missense variant pathogenicity classification and ClinGen recommendations for clinical use of PP3/BP4 criteria 96%
- Evidence-based recommendations for gene-specific ACMG/AMP variant classification from the ClinGen ENIGMA BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variant Curation Expert Panel 94%
- A Scalable Framework for Identifying Allelic Series from Summary Statistics 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.