Back

Habitat complexity reduces feeding strength of freshwater predators

Aranbarri, M.; Flores, L.; de Guzman, I.; Larranaga, A.; Elosegi, A.; Rall, B. C.; Reiss, J.

2025-02-27 ecology
10.1101/2025.02.22.639633 bioRxiv
Show abstract

1. The physical structure of an environment potentially influences feeding interactions among organisms, for instance, by providing refuge for prey. We examined how habitat complexity affects the functional feeding response of an ambush predator (damselfly larvae Ischnura elegans) and a pursuit predator (backswimmer Notonecta glauca) feeding on the isopod Asellus aquaticus. 2. We ran experiments in aquatic microcosms with an increasing number of structural elements (0, 2, or 3 rings of plastic plants in different spatial configurations), resulting in five habitat complexity levels. Across these levels, predators were presented with different prey densities to determine the functional response pattern. The experimental design and analysis allowed us to test for effects of structure presence, amount, and complexity level on functional response in one pass, without confounding predictors. 3. The feeding for both predators across all complexity levels was best described by a type II functional response model, and habitat drove feeding strength. Regarding the latter, the predators showed different responses to the complexity treatments. The overall feeding rate of I. elegans was mainly explained by the absence vs. presence of structure. Yet, in the case of N. glauca, feeding rate was strongly dependent on habitat complexity with the predator showing a unique maximum feeding rate (i.e. the inverse of the handling time) for each complexity level and a decreasing attack rate with increasing amount of habitat. 4. On average, prey consumption by both predators was reduced when complex structures were present, compared to the no habitat structure environment (e.g. consumption more than halved for some treatments). Our findings demonstrate that habitat complexity dampens feeding rates and therefore plays a key role in the stability of freshwater ecosystems.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.0%
2
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
3
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
4
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.7%
5
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
6
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.1%
7
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.9%
8
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
10
Freshwater Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
11
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
3.0%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
14
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
15
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.0%
16
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
17
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
19
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
20
Marine Ecology Progress Series
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
21
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
22
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
23
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
24
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
26
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
28
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
30
Behavioral Ecology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%