Sexual health empowerment interventions for migrant women: the protocol of a systematic review of the literature
Ouanhnon, L.; Daumail, L.; Kerihuel, M.; Palmaro, A.; Dupouy, J.; Durand, M.-A.
Show abstract
IntroductionMigrant women are suffering from inequalities in access to care and prevention, quality of care, and in particular, sexual health care. As part of an overall project to develop a primary care intervention aimed at empowering migrant women in sexual health, the first objective will be to review the characteristics of sexual health empowerment interventions targeting migrant women. The second objective will be to assess the effectiveness of these interventions. Methods and analysisA systematic review will be conducted across PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Psychinfo/ Psycharticles, Web of science, Cairn, as well as grey literature, from inception until 01/01/2023. We will include randomized clinical trials, quasi-experimental, and qualitative studies published in any language before 01/01/2023, assessing the effect of a sexual health empowerment intervention targeted at migrant women and meeting the selection criteria. Screening of articles and data extraction will be conducted by two independent researchers. Disagreements will be resolved by a third reviewer. The quality of all included studies will be assessed using validated tools according to the study design. Results will be reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidlines, and a narrative synthesis will be conducted. Ethics and diffusionThis systematic review will involve only secondary data, so ethical approval was not required for this study. The results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and conferences.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Scalability of mobile technology interventions in the prevention and management of HIV among adolescents in low- and middle-income countries: protocol for a systematic review 96%
- Positive deviance for promoting dual-method contraceptive use among women in Uganda: a cluster randomized controlled trial 95%
- Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Maternity care professionals’ preparedness for and experiences of screening and responding to disclosures of domestic violence in the peripartum period: a protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis 97%
- Effectiveness of integrating cervical cancer prevention strategies into HIV care programmes: A mixed-methods systematic review protocol 96%
- A community-based mentoring scheme for pregnant and parenting adolescents in Sierra Leone: protocol for a hybrid pilot cluster randomised controlled trial 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of Interviewer-Administered Telephone Surveys during Infectious Disease Outbreaks, Epidemics, and Pandemics: A Scoping Review 93%
- Effects of a multimedia campaign on HIV self-testing and PrEP outcomes among young people in South Africa: A mixed-methods impact evaluation of ‘MTV Shuga Down South’ 92%
- A double-edged sword - Telemedicine for maternal care during COVID-19: Findings from a global mixed methods study of healthcare providers 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence and factors associated with use of prophylaxis for HIV and sexually transmitted infections among sexual health service attendees in England: findings from a cross-sectional observational study 92%
- Delivering maternal and child health interventions through the private sector in LMIC: a scoping review of strategies and effective approaches 91%
- Does domestic violence legislation reduce permissive attitudes about intimate partner violence? Longitudinal evidence from men and women from 61 countries. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mapping of person-centred sexual and reproductive health interventions at primary healthcare settings: An umbrella review 95%
- Contraceptive use and pregnancy planning in Britain during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from a large, quasi-representative survey (Natsal-COVID) 93%
- Should COVID-specific arrangements for abortion continue? The views of women experiencing abortion in Britain during the pandemic 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.