Validity and wear compliance of wrist-wearable activity trackers in free-living schoolchildren: validation study
Yamakita, M.; Ando, D.; Sato, M.; Akiyama, Y.; Yamaguchi, K.; Yamagata, Z.
Show abstract
IntroductionWearable activity trackers are widely available for promoting physical activity (PA) and reducing sedentary behavior (SB). However, studies assessing their validity for PA and SB measurement in free-living conditions in school-age children remain limited. ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the criterion validity and wear compliance of the Fitbit Ace, a wrist-worn wearable activity tracker designed for children, in measuring PA and SB under free-living conditions. MethodsA total of 102 children (mean age: 10.2 years; 44.1% girls) simultaneously wore a waist-worn accelerometer (Omron Active Style Pro HJA-750c; ASP HJA-750c) and a Fitbit Ace for 11 consecutive days. Step count and time spent in SB, light PA (LPA), moderate PA (MPA), and vigorous PA (VPA) were collected from both devices. Pearsons and Spearmans correlations assessed criterion validity, while Bland-Altman plots, mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to evaluate agreement. Wear compliance was compared between the two devices. ResultsThe Fitbit Ace showed a very strong correlation with step count and strong correlations with SB, LPA, and moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA). However, significant differences were observed for all PA variables. The Fitbit Ace overestimated step count, SB, VPA, and MVPA, whereas it underestimated LPA and MPA. Agreement between devices was low, with proportional errors in step count, LPA, VPA, and MVPA. MAPE exceeded 20% for all variables, including step count (21.7%), SB (31.2%), LPA (30.3%), and MVPA (120.7%). The proportion of children meeting the criterion of [≥]10 h/day wear criterion was higher for the Fitbit Ace (83.2%) than for the ASP HJA-750c (57.8%), as was adherence to [≥]4 days (97.0% vs. 62.2%). ConclusionWhile caution is needed when using the Fitbit Ace for precise measurement of individual PA, it is a useful tool for assessing overall patterns of step count, SB, and LPA in school-aged children.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of raw accelerometry data from ActiGraph, Apple Watch, Garmin, and Fitbit using a mechanical shaker table 97%
- Behaviour-based movement cut-off points in 3-year old children comparing wrist- with hip-worn actigraphs MW8 and GT3X 97%
- Number of days required to estimate objectively measured physical activity constructs in different age groups 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Covid-19 lockdown: Ethnic differences in children’s self-reported physical activity and the importance of leaving the home environment. A longitudinal and cross-sectional 93%
- Vigorous intermittent lifestyle physical activity (VILPA) and mortality risk among US adults: a wearables-based national cohort study 92%
- German Recommendations for Physical Activity and Physical Activity Promotion in Adults with Noncommunicable Diseases 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reference values and validation of the 1-min sit-to-stand test in healthy 5- to 16-year-old youth: a cross-sectional study 95%
- Wireless physical activity monitor use among adults living with HIV in a community-based exercise intervention study: a quantitative longitudinal observational study 94%
- Taking a participatory research approach within workplace health promotion research to improve physical activity levels in office-based workers: a scoping review protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Variability in physical inactivity responses of university students during COVID-19 pandemic: A monitoring of daily step counts using a smartphone application 93%
- Successful reboot of high-performance sporting activities by Japanese national women’s handball team in Tokyo, 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic: An initiative by Japan Sports-Cyber Physical System (JS-CPS) of Sports Research Innovation Project (SRIP) 92%
- Practical recommendations for staying physically active during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic literature review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- How can digital citizen science approaches improve ethical smartphone use surveillance among youth: traditional surveys versus ecological momentary assessments 94%
- Use of assistive technology to assess distal motor function in subjects with neuromuscular disease 92%
- Feasibility and preliminary efficacy of an online mindful walking intervention among COVID-19 long haulers: A mixed method study including daily diary surveys 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.