Back

Womens Sociocultural Representations of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis and Intimate Partner Violence in Heterosexual Relationships: A Qualitative Story Method

Willie, T. C.; Sharpless, L.; Knight, D.; Shah, A.; Antar, A.; Watts, T.; Alexander, K.; Kershaw, T.

2025-02-21 hiv aids
10.1101/2025.02.20.25322597 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveThe current study sought to assess womens understanding of pre-exposure prophylaxis interest and initiation in heterosexually-active relationships with and without histories of intimate partner violence. Design2017-18 prospective cohort study with an embedded, story completion exercise in the 90-day follow-up such that participants were randomized to receive one of two versions of a story stem based on whether they experienced intimate partner violence. SettingConnecticut. Participants132 heterosexually-active, cisgender adult women residing in the state of Connecticut. Primary outcomes measuresOur primary outcome included identifying principal narratives that describes womens conceptualizations of pre-exposure prophylaxis interest and initiation in heterosexually-active relationships. ResultsUsing both story mapping and thematic analysis techniques, four principal narratives were identified across the stories: 1) the Informed and Empowered PrEP User, 2) the Clandestine PrEP User, 3) the Hesitant PrEP Contemplator, and 4) the Disenfranchised PrEP Non-User. These novel narratives provide insights on how social, clinical, and interpersonal factors are underpinning heterosexually-active, cisgender adult womens ability to display interest and initiate pre-exposure prophylaxis in their relationships. ConclusionsIf our findings are replicated in studies in different settings, it will provide substantial support for future prevention interventions adopting empowerment-centered approaches to refocus womens needs in the context of PrEP initiation and healthy relationships.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.