Back

Measurement Quality Metrics to Improve Absolute Microbial Cell Counting

Parratt, K.; Newton, D.; Dunkers, J. P.; Dootz, J. N.; Hunter, M. E.; Logan, A.; Pierce, L.; Sarkar, S.; Servetas, S. L.; Lin, N.

2025-02-19 microbiology
10.1101/2025.02.18.638308 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Total and viable microbial cell counts are increasingly important for applications including live biotherapeutic products, food safety, and probiotics. In microbiology, cells are quantified using methods such as colony forming unit (CFU), flow cytometry, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), but different methods measure different aspects of the cells (measurands), and results may not be directly comparable across methods. In the absence of a ground-truth reference material for cell count, one cannot quantify the accuracy of any cell counting method, which limits method performance assessments and comparisons. Herein, a modified analysis of cell counting methods based on the ISO 20391-2:2019 standard was developed and demonstrated for microbial cell samples diluted over a log-scale range of concentrations. Escherichia coli samples ranging in concentration from approximately 5 x 105 cells/mL to 2 x 107 cells/mL were quantified using CFU, Coulter principle, fluorescence flow cytometry, and impedance flow cytometry. Quality metrics modified from the ISO standard were calculated for each method and shown to be repeatable across replicate experiments. The quality metrics illustrate large differences in proportionality and variability across methods, with total cell counts in good agreement and viable cell count having more variability. As the ISO standard is meant to guide fit-for-purpose method selection, interpretation of the results and quality metrics can drive method choice and optimization. The framework introduced here will help researchers select fit-for-purpose counting methods for quantification of microbial total and viable cells across a range of applications.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Microbiological Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
2
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.3%
3
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.4%
5
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.9%
6
International Journal of Food Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
7
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
9
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
10
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.5%
12
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
13
ACS ES&T Water
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
14
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
15
Journal of Applied Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
16
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
17
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
18
MicrobiologyOpen
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
19
SLAS Technology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
20
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
23
Microbiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
PLOS Water
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
28
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
29
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.7%
30
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%