Balancing preferences and constraints around nurses shift scheduling across healthcare organisations: a qualitative study
Barker, H. R.; Griffiths, P.; Dall'Ora, C.
Show abstract
AimTo understand how preferences and constraints of nursing staff, nurse managers and hospital directors interact and influence decisions around nurse shift patterns BackgroundGlobally, many nursing staff have expressed intention to leave the profession and high levels of stress and burnout. Shift patterns are often cited as a key driver of negative nurse outcomes. How preferences and constraints of staff groups involved in nurse shift scheduling interact to shape decisions remains unexplored. DesignQualitative study. We interviewed 17 nursing staff, 5 nurse managers and 6 hospital directors. MethodsStaff were recruited through 5 NHS Trusts based in the North, Midlands, East and South of England. The results were analysed using inductive and deductive framework analysis. ResultsThree themes were identified that influenced nurses decisions for shift scheduling: 1/ Balancing Choice with Consistency, Predictability and Flexibility; 2/Adequate Rest and Recovery Between Shifts; and 3/Enjoyment and Engagement at Work. There was a meta-theme of conflicting priorities for shift scheduling between nursing staff, nurse managers and hospital directors across these three themes. ConclusionsDifferent priorities for shift scheduling of nursing staff, nurse managers and hospital directors created potential or actual conflict. Solutions appeared to consist of compromises where priorities of different staff groups were simultaneously upheld to an acceptable level. This occurred through collaborative interactions across staff groups. Implications for PracticeNursing staff, nurse managers and hospital directors can facilitate choice and flexibility and navigate conflicts in nurse shift scheduling through collaborative approaches that enhance awareness and effective communication. Reporting MethodQualitative data was reported using the EQUATOR checklist COREQ. No Patient or Public Contribution What does this paper contribute to the wider global clinical community? Collaborative approaches can influence conflicting priorities of staff groups in relation to nurse shift scheduling. Staff understanding other staff priorities for nurse shift scheduling enhances awareness.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Stressors, Manifestations and Course of COVID-19 Related Distress Among Nurses and Midwives in Tasmania 96%
- Capturing the experiences of UK healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structural topic modelling analysis of 7,412 free-text survey responses 96%
- What support do frontline workers want? A qualitative study of health and social care workers’ experiences and views of psychosocial support during the COVID-19 pandemic 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Occupational challenges of health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. A qualitative study 96%
- The preparedness and response to COVID-19 in a quaternary Intensive Care Unit in Australia: perspectives and insights from frontline critical care clinicians 95%
- Redeployment and training of healthcare professionals to Intensive Care during COVID-19: a systemic review 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Anxiety, depression, and insomnia among nurses during the full liberalization of COVID-19: A multicenter cross-sectional analysis of the high-income region in China 93%
- COVID-19 critical care simulations: An international cross-sectional survey 91%
- Agility and sustainability: A qualitative evaluation of COVID-19 Non-pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) in the UK logistics sector 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Secondary Stressors And Their Psychosocial Impacts On Healthcare Staff: Lessons From A Qualitative Systematic Review From The COVID-19 Pandemic In The UK 95%
- Healthcare Workers' Mental Health and Wellbeing During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the UK: Contrasting Guidelines with Experiences in Practice 90%
- ‘I had no life. I was only existing’ . Factors shaping the mental health and wellbeing of people experiencing long Covid: a qualitative study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Healthcare workers’ mental health and wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic: Longitudinal analysis of interview and social media data 96%
- The Lifecycle of Electronic Health Record Data in HIV-Related Big Data Studies: A Qualitative Study of Instances of and Potential Opportunities to Minimize Bias 88%
- Work-related and Personal Factors Associated with Mental Well-being during COVID-19 Response: A Survey of Health Care and Other Workers 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.