Unbiased human genomic characterization of polyglutamine disorder genes to inform therapeutic strategies
Namuli, K. L.; Drogemoller, B. I.; Wright, G. E. B.
Show abstract
BackgroundPolyglutamine (polyQ) disorders, such as Huntington disease (HD) and several spinocerebellar ataxias, are severe neurological disorders caused by glutamine codon repeat expansions. These conditions lack effective treatments, with therapeutic research focused on pathogenic gene knockdown. ObjectivesWe aimed to profile these genes using diverse human genomic data to inform therapeutic strategies by identifying new biology and assessing the potential on-target effects of knocking down these genes. MethodsWe conducted an unbiased phenome-wide study to identify human traits and diseases linked to polyQ disorder genes (Open Targets L2G>0.5). Network analyses explored shared trait associations and overlapping biological processes among these genes. Lastly, we assessed the theoretical druggability of polyQ disorder genes using recently identified features predictive of clinical trial success and compared them to repeat expansion (HD) modifier genes. ResultsWe identified 215 human phenotype/polyQ disorder gene associations from 3,095 studies, indicating potential adverse effects from gene knockdown. Shared trait associations among genes suggested overlapping biological processes despite distinct functions. Drug target profile analysis revealed unfavorable risk profiles for polyQ disorder genes, particularly ATN1, ATXN1, ATXN7, and HTT, due to genomic features such as constraint, molecular interactions, and tissue specificity. PolyQ disorder genes also showed significantly more safety-related risks than HD genetic modifier genes (P=7.03x10-3). ConclusionOur analyses emphasize the pleiotropic nature of polyQ disorder genes, highlighting their potential risks as drug targets. These findings reinforce the importance of exploring alternative therapeutic strategies, such as targeting genetic modifier genes, as well as allele-selective approaches, to mitigate these challenges.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-coding variants upstream of MEF2C cause severe developmental disorder through three distinct loss-of-function mechanisms 94%
- Transcriptome-wide outlier approach identifies individuals with minor spliceopathies 93%
- The landscape of autosomal-recessive pathogenic variants in European populations reveals phenotype-specific effects 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mendelian gene identification through mouse embryo viability screening 95%
- STRchive: a dynamic resource detailing population-level and locus-specific insights at tandem repeat disease loci 95%
- Systematic analysis of genetic and phenotypic characteristics reveals antisense oligonucleotide therapy potential for one-third of neurodevelopmental disorders 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Discordance between a deep learning model and clinical-grade variant pathogenicity classification in a rare disease cohort 93%
- Comprehensive reanalysis for CNVs in ES data from unsolved rare disease cases results in new diagnoses 92%
- Association between genes regulating neural pathways for quantitative traits of speech and language disorders 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.