Back

Self-Supervised Learning Can Distinguish Myelodysplastic Neoplasms from Clinical Mimics Using Bone Marrow Biopsies

Mehrtash, V.; Le, H.; Jafarzadeh, B.; Loghavi, S.; Garcia-Manero, G.; Tsirigos, A.; Park, C. Y.

2025-02-21 pathology
10.1101/2025.02.17.25322075 medRxiv
Show abstract

The diagnosis of myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) requires examination of the bone marrow for morphologic evidence of dysplasia. We sought to determine if a self-supervised learning (SSL) AI image analysis approach may be utilized to reliably distinguish MDS from its clinically relevant mimics using bone marrow biopsies (BMBx). Whole slide images (WSIs) of H&E- and reticulin-stained BMBx sections from 243 unique patients (89 MDS, 55 non-MDS cytopenic controls [NMCC], and 99 negative control [NC] cases) were segmented into tiles and analyzed. These tiles were then processed using the Barlow Twins SSL model to generate histomorphologic phenotype clusters (HPCs). Review of the HPCs revealed the clusters enriched in MDS captured known histopathologic features of MDS including hypercellularity, dysplastic and clustered megakaryocytes, increased immature hematopoietic cells, increased vascularity, fibrosis, and cell streaming patterns. Assessment of 95 MDS BMBx images from a second institution showed consistent HPC enrichment patterns, validating the robustness of the model. The trained ensemble model using H&E- and reticulin-stained slides distinguished MDS from NCs with an AUC of 0.89, and from age-matched, NMCCs with an AUC of 0.84. These findings demonstrate the potential of SSL approaches to capture diagnostically relevant morphologic patterns and to improve the reproducibility of MDS diagnosis.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
40.9%
2
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.6%
3
Journal of Pathology Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.8%
5
Cytometry Part A
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
6
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.8%
7
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
8
Blood Cancer Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
10
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
11
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
12
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
13
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
14
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
15
The American Journal of Pathology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
16
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
17
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
18
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
19
Leukemia
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
20
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Clinical and Translational Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%