Back

Evaluating cotinine cutoffs and sociodemographic factors associated with exclusive heavy e-cigarette vaping behavior

Arun, A. S.; Shah, R.; Baldassarri, S. R.; Lu, Y.; Krumholz, H.

2025-02-21 public and global health
10.1101/2025.02.16.25322376 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionElectronic cigarette (e-cig) use in previously tobacco-naive individuals may increase the risk of nicotine addiction and adverse health outcomes, including lung injury and cardiovascular disease. This study identifies a subgroup of heavy exclusive e-cig vapers, characterizes their demographics, and establishes an optimal serum cotinine threshold to differentiate them from tobacco-naive individuals. MethodsWe analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2013- 2020) to characterize serum cotinine levels by e-cig use frequency. The optimal cotinine cutoff for identifying heavy exclusive vapers was 2.2 ng/mL (sensitivity 98%, specificity 96%). We used receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to identify the cotinine threshold for discriminating heavy exclusive e-cig vapers from tobacco-naive individuals and logistic regression to explore sociodemographic factors. ResultsExclusive heavy e-cig vapers--defined as those who vaped on four or more of the past five days--had mean cotinine levels (220 {+/-} 38 ng/mL) comparable to cigarette smokers (212 {+/-} 6 ng/mL). These vapers were more likely to be 12-18 (AOR 7.96; 95% CI: [3.38 - 18.7]) or 19-25 [AOR 7.36 [2.84 - 19]) years old and less likely to be female (AOR 0.3 [0.16-0.57]). ConclusionHeavy exclusive e-cig vapers had serum cotinine levels similar to cigarette smokers and were predominantly young males. Public health interventions should target this high-risk subgroup to reduce potential long-term health consequences.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.