Evaluating cotinine cutoffs and sociodemographic factors associated with exclusive heavy e-cigarette vaping behavior
Arun, A. S.; Shah, R.; Baldassarri, S. R.; Lu, Y.; Krumholz, H.
Show abstract
IntroductionElectronic cigarette (e-cig) use in previously tobacco-naive individuals may increase the risk of nicotine addiction and adverse health outcomes, including lung injury and cardiovascular disease. This study identifies a subgroup of heavy exclusive e-cig vapers, characterizes their demographics, and establishes an optimal serum cotinine threshold to differentiate them from tobacco-naive individuals. MethodsWe analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2013- 2020) to characterize serum cotinine levels by e-cig use frequency. The optimal cotinine cutoff for identifying heavy exclusive vapers was 2.2 ng/mL (sensitivity 98%, specificity 96%). We used receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to identify the cotinine threshold for discriminating heavy exclusive e-cig vapers from tobacco-naive individuals and logistic regression to explore sociodemographic factors. ResultsExclusive heavy e-cig vapers--defined as those who vaped on four or more of the past five days--had mean cotinine levels (220 {+/-} 38 ng/mL) comparable to cigarette smokers (212 {+/-} 6 ng/mL). These vapers were more likely to be 12-18 (AOR 7.96; 95% CI: [3.38 - 18.7]) or 19-25 [AOR 7.36 [2.84 - 19]) years old and less likely to be female (AOR 0.3 [0.16-0.57]). ConclusionHeavy exclusive e-cig vapers had serum cotinine levels similar to cigarette smokers and were predominantly young males. Public health interventions should target this high-risk subgroup to reduce potential long-term health consequences.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Associations between e-cigarette use and e-cigarette flavors with cigarette smoking quit attempts and quit success: Evidence from a US large, nationally representative 2018-2019 survey 97%
- E-cigarettes With Varenicline Versus Varenicline for Smoking Cessation: A Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial 94%
- Impact of a regional educational advertising campaign on harm perceptions of e-cigarettes, prevalence of e-cigarette use, and quit attempts among smokers 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- E-cigarette use and Respiratory Symptoms in Residents of the United States: A BRFSS Report 96%
- The effects of reduced nicotine content cigarettes in smokers with mood or anxiety disorders: a double-blind randomized trial 96%
- From Traits to Puffs: The Interplay of Personality, Pandemic Stress, and Smoking Behaviors 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transitions from smoking to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use, or stopping nicotine use in ALSPAC and their association with modifiable and sociodemographic factors 95%
- The changing face of nicotine use in England: age-specific annual trends, 2014-2024 93%
- Changes in vaping trends since the announcement of an impending ban on disposable vapes: a population study in Great Britain 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Changes in injecting versus smoking heroin, fentanyl, and methamphetamine among people who inject drugs in San Diego, California, 2020 to 2023 93%
- Associations between reasons for vaping and current vaping and smoking status: Evidence from a UK based cohort 93%
- Associations between vaping and Covid-19: cross-sectional findings from the HEBECO study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.