Back

Association between fractional exhaled nitric oxide and peripheral eosinophils in patients with asthma: a retrospective cohort study

Habis, Y.; Sakkat, A.; Alaidaroos, S.; AlGhamdi, R.; Almuwalad, N.; Aljuhani, J.; Alharbi, A.

2025-02-18 respiratory medicine
10.1101/2025.02.15.25322353 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundFractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and peripheral eosinophils are important biomarkers of Type 2 inflammation in asthma. FeNO reflects airway inflammation, while eosinophil counts indicate systemic eosinophilic activity. Their combined utility in asthma management warrants further investigation. ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess and compare FeNO levels and peripheral eosinophils in asthmatic patients, examining their relationship with disease characteristics and bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR). MethodsA retrospective analysis of 101 adult asthmatic patients at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, was conducted. Patient data on FeNO, eosinophil counts, spirometry, and comorbidities were collected and analyzed using correlation and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. ResultsThe mean FeNO level was 68.9{+/-}61.3 ppb, and the mean eosinophil count was 310.5{+/-}344.2 cells/L. FeNO levels were significantly higher in patients with eosinophil counts [≥]300 cells/L (p=0.012) and correlated positively with BDR (r=0.38, p=0.001) but not with eosinophil counts (r=0.16, p=0.11) or asthma control test (ACT) scores. Eosinophil counts were significantly associated with moderate airway obstruction (p=0.041). FeNO showed a borderline ability to differentiate allergic rhinitis (p=0.059) but limited performance in identifying other comorbidities, such as chronic rhinosinusitis (p=0.17), GERD (p=0.87), and eczema/atopic dermatitis (p=0.11 and p=0.24, respectively). ConclusionFeNO and peripheral eosinophil counts are valuable complementary biomarkers for assessing type 2 inflammation in asthma and guiding treatment. However, their variability across clinical contexts underscores the need for integration with other assessments. These findings support a multidimensional approach to asthma management and call for further research to refine their clinical applications.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.8%
2
Respiratory Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
3
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.3%
4
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.9%
6
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
7
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.7%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
10
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
11
Allergy
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
12
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
15
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
17
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
18
Clinical Immunology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
20
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
21
Medical Research Archives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
22
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
23
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%