Back

Mission imputable: Effects of missing data processing on infectious disease detection and prognosis

Roy, S. S.; Nguyen, N. T.; Zuniga, A.; Sarhaddi, F.; Lagerspetz, E.; Flores, H.; Nurmi, P.

2025-02-16 health informatics
10.1101/2025.02.15.25322351 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMissing data in medical datasets poses significant challenges for developing effective AI/ML pipelines. Inaccurate imputation can lead to biased results, reduced model performance, and compromised clinical insights. Understanding how different imputation methods affect AI/ML model performance is crucial for ensuring accurate clinical findings. ObjectiveThis study systematically investigates the effects of different imputation methods on AI/ML model performance and the clinical implications of these methods. MethodsWe investigate the impact of four different missing data strategies on the performance of common classification algorithms for analyzing medical data. The performance was evaluated based on sensitivity and specificity metrics for the tasks of predicting COVID-19 diagnosis and patient deterioration. We also perform feature analysis to understand the clinical implications the choice of imputation method has. ResultsOur findings show that the choice of imputation method significantly affects the performance of AI/ML techniques and the clinical conclusions drawn from the data. The optimal handling of missing values depends on (i) the composition of the features with missing values, (ii) the rate of missing values, and (iii) the pattern of the missing features. Using COVID-19 diagnosis and patient deterioration as representative examples of clinical tasks, our results indicate that MICE imputation yields the best overall performance, resulting in a 26% improvement in accuracy compared to baseline methods. Specifically, for predicting COVID-19 diagnosis, we achieved a sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 98%, while for patient deterioration, the sensitivity was 65% and specificity was 99%. ConclusionThis study demonstrates the critical impact of missing data imputation on AI/ML model performance and the clinical insights derived from these models. Our findings underscore the importance of selecting appropriate imputation techniques tailored to the specific characteristics of medical data to ensure accurate and reliable AI/ML predictions.

Published in PLOS One · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.