Applying Machine-Learning and Deep-Learning to Predict Depression from Brain MRI and Identify Depression-Related Brain Biology
Jiang, J. C.; Brianceau, C.; Delzant, E.; Colle, R.; Bottemanne, H.; Corruble, E.; Wray, N. R.; Colliot, O.; Shah, S.; Couvy-Duchesne, B.
Show abstract
The accuracy of grey-matter predictors of depression has remained limited. In this study, brain-based predictors of major depressive disorder (MDD) were trained using machine-learning (Best Linear Unbiased Predictors [BLUP]) and deep-learning (ResNet3D) techniques applied to high-dimensional (voxel-wise) grey-matter structure extracted from T1-weighted structural MRI. The training sample comprised 987 MDD cases and 3,934 controls from the UK Biobank. Predictors were evaluated in an independent sub-cohort of 483 MDD cases and 1,939 controls from the UK Biobank and replicated in a clinical cohort (DEP-ARREST CLIN) of 64 cases and 32 controls. In the UK Biobank, logistic regression showed a significant association between the BLUP predictor and MDD status (AUC=0.57; OR=1.28 [1.15-1.43]; p-value=1.1x10-5), which was confirmed in both males and females. By partitioning the BLUP predictor by brain regions of interest (ROI), we found nominal significance supporting the contribution of previously identified MDD-related ROIs (e.g. hippocampus and amygdala). The BLUP predictor overlapped partially with a polygenic score (PGS) of major depression but also captured a signal that was not captured by the genetic score (combined AUC=0.66, p-value=0.024 when compared to PGS alone). No association passed multiple testing correction in the DEP-ARREST CLIN cohort, likely due to the small sample size. In contrast, the deep-learning predictor did not show a significant association with MDD after multiple testing corrections. Our novel application of the BLUP method shows promising predicting accuracy and suggests new leads to overcome the remaining challenges in predicting MDD from brain imaging.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Causal influence of dietary habits on the risk of major depressive disorder: A diet-wide Mendelian randomization analysis 94%
- Development and validation of a machine learning model to predict cognitive behavioral therapy outcome in obsessive-compulsive disorder using clinical and neuroimaging data 94%
- Electroconvulsive therapy effects on anhedonia and reward circuitry anatomy: a dimensional structural neuroimaging approach 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Polygenic prediction of major depressive disorder and related traits in African ancestries UK Biobank participants 96%
- Structural brain alterations associated with suicidal thoughts and behaviors in young people: results across 21 international studies from the ENIGMA Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviours consortium 95%
- Neuroimaging profiling identifies distinct brain maturational subtypes of youth with mood and anxiety disorders 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Heterogeneity in Depression: evidence for distinct clinical and neurobiological profiles 95%
- White matter tract integrity is reduced in major depression and in individuals with genetic liability for depression 95%
- Aberrant levels of cortical myelin distinguish individuals with unipolar depression from healthy controls 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Emotion regulation in emerging adults with major depressive disorder and frequent cannabis use 94%
- Disorder- and emotional context-specific neurofunctional alterations during inhibitory control in generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder 94%
- Predicting depression risk in early adolescence via multimodal brain imaging 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.