Putative breast cancer risk variants from populations of South Asian ancestry are under-represented in public variant classification databases
Rony, R.; Deng, S.; Yeng, S.; Doig, K.; Goode, D. L.
Show abstract
The majority of publicly available genomics data originates from populations of European ancestry. This limits understanding and detection of inherited genetic risk factors for breast cancer in other populations. To assess the extent to which deficits in knowledge of the genetics of breast cancer risk exist for populations of non-European ancestry, we compared data available on putative breast cancer risk variants in the ClinVar database for populations of different ancestry. Protein-coding insertions and deletions (indels) and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) private to populations of Non-Finnish European (NFE), African (AFR), Admixed American (AMR), East Asian (EAS) and South Asian (SAS) ancestry from the Genome Aggregation Consortium (gnomAD v4) were identified for nine established breast cancer risk genes. The percentage of private protein-coding variants listed as Unreported by gnomAD in ClinVar were compared between populations. The SAS population had the biggest knowledge deficit, as 43.4% of private SAS variants were not reported in ClinVar, compared to 20-30% for other populations. Proportionally fewer SAS variants were reported for all 9 genes, with the difference reaching an adjusted p < 0.05 for PALB2, ATM and BRCA2 when compared to NFE. In contrast, few genes had significantly lower ClinVar reporting rates for AFR, AMR and EAS than for NFE. ClinVar reporting deficits in the SAS population were observed for both missense and protein-truncating variants. Unreported variants were usually very rare and largely absent in other public repositories. A substantial fraction of unreported variants were protein-truncating (17.2%), or missense with high predicted pathogenicity scores, representing novel candidate breast cancer risk alleles. Our work demonstrates putative breast cancer risk variants from populations of South Asian ancestry are less likely to be reported in ClinVar. Defining and removing barriers to reporting potential risk variants for breast cancer from South Asian populations is needed to reduce this knowledge deficit.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cancer PRSweb - an Online Repository with Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) for Major Cancer Traits and Their Phenome-wide Exploration in Two Independent Biobanks 94%
- Availability of benign missense variant “truthsets” for validation of functional assays: current status and a novel systematic approach 93%
- Segregation analysis of 17,425 population-based breast cancer families: evidence for genetic susceptibility and risk prediction 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating diagnostic noise in panel-based genomic analysis 94%
- Performance of polygenic risk scores for cancer prediction in a racially diverse academic biobank 93%
- Classification of Variants of Reduced Penetrance in High Penetrance Cancer Susceptibility Genes: Framework for Genetics Clinicians and Clinical Scientists by CanVIG-UK (Cancer Variant Interpretation Group-UK) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inverted genomic regions between reference genome builds in humans impact imputation accuracy and decrease the power of association testing 93%
- Characteristics predicting reduced penetrance variants in the high-risk cancer predisposition gene TP53 93%
- Pleiotropy-guided transcriptome imputation from normal and tumor tissues identifies new candidate susceptibility genes for breast and ovarian cancer 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.