UK health and social care use during and after the pandemic: A qualitative study of the experiences of disabled people from minoritised ethnic groups
Rivas, C.; Anand, K.; Ball, E.; Begum, S.; Heera, N.; Shahid, Y.; Zuzer Lal, Z.; Moore, A. P.
Show abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic acted as a "super-catalyst" in accelerating the United Kingdom transition to remote health and social care, while exposing and deepening existing inequities. The 18-month mixed-methods longitudinal CICADA study explored this from the perspective of disabled individuals from minoritised ethnic groups (including undocumented migrants and asylum seekers) during and after the pandemic. Since our aim was to inform improvements, we used an asset and strengths-based approach underpinned by the embodiment model of disability and intersectional theory. Here we report on findings from 271 semi-structured interviews with disabled individuals from minoritised ethnic groups, follow-on workshops with interviewees in April and September 2022, and 4 key informant interviews. Findings revealed widespread dissatisfaction. Many found the shift to remote care inaccessible and disempowering. Challenges included difficulties in securing appointments, disrupted patient-clinician relationships, little regard for holistic care or comorbidities, and systemic exclusions due to intersecting and discriminating factors of language, accent, disability and complex needs, digital precarity, and undocumented status. Often, service management of expectations would have improved experiences. The increased burden from health and social care support-seeking counter-intuitively worsened once pandemic restrictions eased and led many to give up; others bypassed general practice or raised complaints, or relied on self-management, traditional remedies or informal support networks. Many resorted to costly and unaffordable private care, often specifically from within their communities, and often having never registered with the National Health Service. There is an urgent need for a more inclusive, tailored approach to health and social care that considers intersecting disadvantages of race, disability, citizenship and socioeconomic status, facilitates community connections and empowerment, and provides support for self-care, alternative care and education. By foregrounding community voices, this research offers valuable insights for policymakers and providers aiming to address disparities and improve health and social care outcomes for marginalized populations.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 97%
- Challenges of visibility and inclusion in Long COVID: a population-based interview study 97%
- Trauma informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Service user experiences and views regarding telemental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a co-produced framework analysis 98%
- Capturing the experiences of UK healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structural topic modelling analysis of 7,412 free-text survey responses 97%
- What support do frontline workers want? A qualitative study of health and social care workers’ experiences and views of psychosocial support during the COVID-19 pandemic 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- The psychosocial impact on frontline health and social care professionals in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study 97%
- The public views of and reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic in England- a qualitative study with diverse ethnicities 97%
- Long Covid and the role of physical activity: a qualitative study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and well-being of people living with a long-term physical health condition: a qualitative study 97%
- Acceptability and feasibility of strategies to shield the vulnerable during the COVID-19 outbreak: a qualitative study in six Sudanese communities 95%
- Experience of clinical services shapes attitudes to mental health data sharing: Findings from a UK-wide survey 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Navigating vaccination choices: The intersecting dynamics of institutional trust, belonging and message perception among Congolese migrants in the UK (A reflexive thematic analysis) 96%
- Stakeholder perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to integrating cardiovascular disease and diabetes management at primary care in Kenya 95%
- The cascading impacts of attacks on health in Syria: A qualitative study of health system and community impacts 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.