3D phenotyping in a Colombian population reveals unique population and ontogenic facial patterns in genetic and rare disorders
Andreu-Montoriol, M.; Pujol, M.; Echeverry-Quiceno, L. M.; Candelo, E.; Heredia-Lidon, A.; Gomez, E.; Solis, P.; Ramirez, D.; Ortiz, D.; Sevillano, X.; Taya, M. R.; Esteban, M. E.; Casado, A.; Pachajoa, H.; Martinez-Abadias, N.
Show abstract
BackgroundApproximately 30-40% of genetic and rare disorders manifest with distinct facial patterns. Traditionally, clinical geneticists have qualitatively assessed facial morphology to support preliminary diagnosis and guide confirmatory genetic testing. However, enhancing early diagnostic accuracy through facial biomarkers demands advanced 3D technologies for analyzing facial dysmorphologies, a deeper understanding of condition-specific disruptions in facial development, and a broader inclusion of diverse human populations. To bridge this gap, we analyzed the 3D phenotypes associated with four genetic syndromes in an admixed Latin American population from Colombia. The sample comprised 47 individuals diagnosed with Down (DS), Morquio (MS), Noonan (NS), and Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) syndromes along with 49 controls within the same age range. For each participant, we generated a 3D facial model using a multi-camera photogrammetric system and registered the 3D coordinates of 21 anatomical facial landmarks. Geometric morphometrics methods were employed to characterize syndrome-specific 3D facial dysmorphologies and to assess their variation compared to controls. We also examined whether these syndromes alter the ontogenetic trajectory of facial growth. ResultsFacial shape differed significantly in all syndromes except NF1. Consistently with previous 2D studies, we identified population-specific facial features in Colombian patients that are not reported in individuals of European descent. Pooled 3D analyses revealed a continuous spectrum of facial dysmorphology, with MS displaying the most distinct morphology and an altered ontogenic pattern. Facial size, sex and age were all significant factors modulating facial shape, with diagnosis explaining 14% of variation in facial morphology. ConclusionsOverall, these findings highlight the importance of accounting for interpopulation, sex and ontogenic variation in facial phenotypes to improve the diagnostic utility and of facial biomarkers. Such approaches may contribute to shortening the diagnostic odyssey for individuals with syndromic and rare genetic conditions.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Advancing Genotype-Phenotype Analysis through 3D Facial Morphometry: Insights from Cri-du-Chat Syndrome 92%
- Clinical description, molecular delineation and genotype-phenotype correlation in 340 patients with KBG syndrome: Addition of 67 new patients 91%
- Advancing in Schaaf-Yang syndrome pathophysiology: from bedside to subcellular analyses of truncated MAGEL2 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The LMSz method - an automatable scalable approach to constructing gene-specific growth charts in rare disorders. 90%
- Structural variant calling and clinical interpretation in 6224 unsolved rare disease exomes 89%
- BCL11A intellectual developmental disorder: defining the clinical spectrum and genotype-phenotype correlations 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Juvenile Mucopolysaccharidosis plus disease caused by a missense mutation in VPS33A 89%
- Splicing impact of deep exonic missense variants in CAPN3 explored systematically by minigene functional assay 89%
- Spectrum of pathogenic variants and multiple founder effects in amelogenesis imperfecta associated with MMP20 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic Heterogeneity and Homogeneity Among Orofacial Cleft Subtypes: Genome-Wide Association Studies in the Cleft Collective 92%
- NGLY1 Deficiency: A Prospective Natural History Study (NHS) 92%
- Copy Number Variants and their Implications for Developmental and Behavioural Problems in Cleft Lip and/or Palate 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.