Back

3D phenotyping in a Colombian population reveals unique population and ontogenic facial patterns in genetic and rare disorders

Andreu-Montoriol, M.; Pujol, M.; Echeverry-Quiceno, L. M.; Candelo, E.; Heredia-Lidon, A.; Gomez, E.; Solis, P.; Ramirez, D.; Ortiz, D.; Sevillano, X.; Taya, M. R.; Esteban, M. E.; Casado, A.; Pachajoa, H.; Martinez-Abadias, N.

2025-02-14 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2025.02.11.25322000
Show abstract

BackgroundApproximately 30-40% of genetic and rare disorders manifest with distinct facial patterns. Traditionally, clinical geneticists have qualitatively assessed facial morphology to support preliminary diagnosis and guide confirmatory genetic testing. However, enhancing early diagnostic accuracy through facial biomarkers demands advanced 3D technologies for analyzing facial dysmorphologies, a deeper understanding of condition-specific disruptions in facial development, and a broader inclusion of diverse human populations. To bridge this gap, we analyzed the 3D phenotypes associated with four genetic syndromes in an admixed Latin American population from Colombia. The sample comprised 47 individuals diagnosed with Down (DS), Morquio (MS), Noonan (NS), and Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) syndromes along with 49 controls within the same age range. For each participant, we generated a 3D facial model using a multi-camera photogrammetric system and registered the 3D coordinates of 21 anatomical facial landmarks. Geometric morphometrics methods were employed to characterize syndrome-specific 3D facial dysmorphologies and to assess their variation compared to controls. We also examined whether these syndromes alter the ontogenetic trajectory of facial growth. ResultsFacial shape differed significantly in all syndromes except NF1. Consistently with previous 2D studies, we identified population-specific facial features in Colombian patients that are not reported in individuals of European descent. Pooled 3D analyses revealed a continuous spectrum of facial dysmorphology, with MS displaying the most distinct morphology and an altered ontogenic pattern. Facial size, sex and age were all significant factors modulating facial shape, with diagnosis explaining 14% of variation in facial morphology. ConclusionsOverall, these findings highlight the importance of accounting for interpopulation, sex and ontogenic variation in facial phenotypes to improve the diagnostic utility and of facial biomarkers. Such approaches may contribute to shortening the diagnostic odyssey for individuals with syndromic and rare genetic conditions.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
11.1%
2
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 12%
11.1%
3
Genetics in Medicine
based on 57 papers
Top 1%
11.1%
4
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 68%
5.0%
5
European Journal of Human Genetics
based on 25 papers
Top 0.3%
4.5%
6
npj Genomic Medicine
based on 18 papers
Top 0.4%
2.9%
7
Journal of Medical Genetics
based on 22 papers
Top 0.5%
2.8%
8
The American Journal of Human Genetics
based on 77 papers
Top 4%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
PLOS Genetics
based on 39 papers
Top 1%
2.8%
10
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 27%
2.3%
11
Frontiers in Genetics
based on 32 papers
Top 2%
2.3%
12
Human Molecular Genetics
based on 28 papers
Top 2%
2.2%
13
Genes
based on 21 papers
Top 0.7%
1.8%
14
Human Mutation
based on 14 papers
Top 0.9%
1.8%
15
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
based on 39 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
based on 22 papers
Top 3%
1.2%
17
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Genome Medicine
based on 56 papers
Top 6%
1.2%
19
Human Genetics
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
based on 100 papers
Top 13%
0.8%
21
Human Genomics
based on 13 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Nature Genetics
based on 72 papers
Top 9%
0.7%
23
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 35%
0.7%
24
iScience
based on 74 papers
Top 9%
0.7%
25
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 18%
0.7%