Back

3D phenotyping in a Colombian population reveals unique population and ontogenic facial patterns in genetic and rare disorders

Andreu-Montoriol, M.; Pujol, M.; Echeverry-Quiceno, L. M.; Candelo, E.; Heredia-Lidon, A.; Gomez, E.; Solis, P.; Ramirez, D.; Ortiz, D.; Sevillano, X.; Taya, M. R.; Esteban, M. E.; Casado, A.; Pachajoa, H.; Martinez-Abadias, N.

2025-02-14 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2025.02.11.25322000 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundApproximately 30-40% of genetic and rare disorders manifest with distinct facial patterns. Traditionally, clinical geneticists have qualitatively assessed facial morphology to support preliminary diagnosis and guide confirmatory genetic testing. However, enhancing early diagnostic accuracy through facial biomarkers demands advanced 3D technologies for analyzing facial dysmorphologies, a deeper understanding of condition-specific disruptions in facial development, and a broader inclusion of diverse human populations. To bridge this gap, we analyzed the 3D phenotypes associated with four genetic syndromes in an admixed Latin American population from Colombia. The sample comprised 47 individuals diagnosed with Down (DS), Morquio (MS), Noonan (NS), and Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) syndromes along with 49 controls within the same age range. For each participant, we generated a 3D facial model using a multi-camera photogrammetric system and registered the 3D coordinates of 21 anatomical facial landmarks. Geometric morphometrics methods were employed to characterize syndrome-specific 3D facial dysmorphologies and to assess their variation compared to controls. We also examined whether these syndromes alter the ontogenetic trajectory of facial growth. ResultsFacial shape differed significantly in all syndromes except NF1. Consistently with previous 2D studies, we identified population-specific facial features in Colombian patients that are not reported in individuals of European descent. Pooled 3D analyses revealed a continuous spectrum of facial dysmorphology, with MS displaying the most distinct morphology and an altered ontogenic pattern. Facial size, sex and age were all significant factors modulating facial shape, with diagnosis explaining 14% of variation in facial morphology. ConclusionsOverall, these findings highlight the importance of accounting for interpopulation, sex and ontogenic variation in facial phenotypes to improve the diagnostic utility and of facial biomarkers. Such approaches may contribute to shortening the diagnostic odyssey for individuals with syndromic and rare genetic conditions.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.8%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.7%
4
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.1%
6
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
7
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.2%
8
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
9
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.9%
10
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
12
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
13
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
14
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
15
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
16
Translational Vision Science & Technology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
17
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
20
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
21
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
22
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
23
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%