Back

Non-target effects on the soil microbiome of a plant root exudate biocontrol for Fusarium wilt

Bedoya, E. T.; Studholme, D. J.; Warmington, R.; Bebber, D. P.

2025-02-11 ecology
10.1101/2025.02.10.637461 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Crop rotation and intercropping with Allium spp. (e.g. garlic, onion) are recognized as biological controls of Fusarium wilt in several crops. However, the non-target effects of this strategy on the soil microbiome are largely unknown. We evaluated the effect of cultivating Musa basjoo, Allium tuberosum (Chinese leek), and their co-cultivation on the rhizosphere and bulk soil microbiome under glasshouse conditions. We do not report the impact of Chinese leek on Foc abundances, as this has been previously reported. The bacterial and fungal communities in the rhizosphere and bulk soil varied depending on the plant type. The microbiomes of allium and bananas were consistently dissimilar, and the co-cultivation treatment contained constituent taxa from both. However, the effect of allium on soil community composition was outweighed by that of bananas in the co-cultivation scenario. Discriminative taxa for allium included members of the genera Sphingomonas, Microbacterium, Flavihumibacter, Brevundimonas, Pseudolabrys, Ramlibacter, Trichoderma, Mortierella and Fusarium. In the case of bananas, predominant biomarkers encompassed members of Rhizobacter, Noviherbaspirillum, Pseudarthrobacter, Aquabacterium, Pseudomonas, Tausonia and Humicola Biomarkers and predictions of functional gene abundances suggest that shifts in the soil microbiome induced by allium are correlated with increases in microorganisms exhibiting potential disease suppression and antibiotic or antifungal traits, whereas those in bananas are associated with plant-growth-promoting microorganisms. The biocontrol efficacy of allium co-cultivation may there involve shifts in the soil microbiome as well as direct impacts of root exudate chemistry on Fusarium plant pathogens.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Applied Soil Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.6%
2
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
9.5%
3
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
4
Phytobiomes Journal
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
5
Plant and Soil
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
6
Environmental Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.3%
7
Environmental Microbiome
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
ISME Communications
120 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.3%
9
Microbial Ecology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.1%
11
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
12
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.6%
13
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
14
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
15
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.6%
16
Environmental Pollution
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
17
Microbiome
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
18
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.1%
19
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
20
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
21
Environmental Microbiology Reports
31 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
22
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.0%
23
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
24
The ISME Journal
228 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Environmental Research
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
FEMS Microbiology Letters
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
27
Archives of Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
28
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%