Minding the Gap in Sentinel Surveillance Networks: An Analysis of Brazilian Indigenous Areas
Oliveira, J. F.; Vasconcelos, A. O.; Alencar, A. L.; Cunha, M. C. L. S.; Marcilio, I.; Barral-Netto, M.; Ramos, P. I. P.
Show abstract
BackgroundOptimizing the allocation of sentinel surveillance sites, particularly aiming early pathogen detection, remains a persistent challenge. Equally critical is ensuring the inclusion of vulnerable and often underserved populations as targets when prioritizing surveillance sites. ObjectiveThis study assesses the current coverage of the respiratory pathogen surveillance network in Brazil and proposes an optimized rearrangement of sentinel locations that balance the coverage of Indigenous populations while integrating country-wide human mobility patterns. MethodsWe collected the locations of Indigenous populations living in Special Indigenous Sanitary Districts (DSEIs) from the Brazilian Ministry of Health, and derived mobility route estimates using the Ford-Fulkerson algorithm applied to input air, road, and water transportation data for the whole country. To optimize sentinel city selection for sample collection, we applied a linear optimization algorithm designed to maximize two key objectives: 1) representation of Indigenous regions and 2) coverage of human mobility patterns, thereby enhancing early pathogen detection. Validation of the strategy was performed by obtaining the current list of cities in Brazils influenza sentinel network combined with a health attraction index from the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics, which enabled us to assess the suitability and potential benefits of our optimized surveillance network. ResultsOur optimization model provides actionable recommendations for pathogen sampling locations, enhancing early detection. By selecting 199 cities, we create a more representative sentinel network, covering all DSEIs by rearranging 108 cities (58.3%), addressing gaps in 9 of 34 previously uncovered regions. This improves nationwide mobility coverage by 16.8 percentage points--from 52.4% to 69.2%--compared to Brazils current sentinel system. Additionally, all newly selected cities serve as hubs for medium to high-complexity healthcare, with 37.9% of DSEI cities lacking coverage in the existing flu sentinel network. ConclusionsWe propose a strategic framework for sentinel site placement that maximizes DSEI coverage and aligns with human mobility patterns across Brazil, improving the overall effectiveness of disease surveillance, particularly in these critical regions and often underserved populations.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Measuring the impact of nonpharmaceutical interventions on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic at a city level: An agent-based computational modeling study of the City of Natal 95%
- The Role of Modelling and Analytics in South African COVID-19 Planning and Budgeting 93%
- Urban pandemic response: survey results describing the experiences from twenty-five cities during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Combining participatory mapping and route optimization algorithms to inform the delivery of community health interventions at the last mile 95%
- Impact of a pilot mHealth intervention on treatment outcomes of TB patients seeking care in the private sector using Propensity Scores Matching – Evidence collated from New Delhi, India 93%
- External validation of a paediatric SMART triage model for use in resource limited facilities 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Young adults vulnerability to COVID-19 in Brazil: an overview across the country 93%
- Assessing the Impact of Human Mobility to Predict Regional Excess Death in Ecuador 93%
- Data-driven identification of previously unrecognized communities with alarming levels of tuberculosis infection in the Democratic Republic of Congo 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.