Singing for lung health following completion of pulmonary rehabilitation - feasibility of a randomised controlled trial.
Lewis, A.; Jung, P.; Williams, P. J.; Steinmann, J.; Ingram, K.; Longley, N.; Trivedi, P.; Clarke, S.; Lammin, H.; Edwards, G.; Koulopoulou, M.; Sureshkumar, A.; Moore, A.; Pfeffer, P. E.; Reardon, L.; Sorley, K.; Kenman, J.; DeLuca, B.; Maguire, M.; Smith, L.-J. E.; Elkin, S.; Lound, A.; Moth, L.; Rickman, P.; Alexander, S.; Lohan, N.; Garsin, E.; Young, S.; Harris, A.; Watters, R.; Lane, C.; Nolan, C. M.; Conway, J.; Man, W. D.-C.; Banya, W.; Anokye, N.; Philip, k. E. J.; Cave, P.; Hopkinson, N. S.
Show abstract
BackgroundPulmonary rehabilitation(PR) is a highly effective intervention for people with chronic respiratory disease, however it is not known how best to sustain its benefits. Clinical trials are needed to establish if participation in Singing for Lung Health(SLH) groups following PR will improve health-related quality-of-life, healthcare utilisation and exercise capacity compared to usual care. A feasibility study would help to guide development of these. MethodsIn a multi-centre, mixed-methods randomised controlled feasibility trial, PR participants at 4 sites, were pre-screened at baseline assessment. An SLH taster session was included routinely as part of the PR programmes. Eligible PR completers were invited to take part in the trial and randomised to usual care or a 12-week SLH course. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment rate, intervention compliance (at least 8/12 sessions) and completeness of data collection including symptom questionnaires, walk tests and physical activity monitoring. Interviews with participants and study personnel about their experience and views of the study were subjected to thematic analysis. ResultsBetween October 2022 and November 2023, 1311 patients were assessed to start PR, 838 completed. Of those completing, 243 were ineligible to take part, (predominantly due to vaccination status and other primary PR diagnoses), and 531 declined. 64 people (33 female, mean(SD) age 69(12), 41 ethnically white, COPD/asthma/interstitial lung disease/bronchiectasis n=33/16/9/6) were recruited with 30(93.8%) SLH and 29(90.6%) controls completing the study. 20(62.5%) of the SLH group completed at least 8/12 SLH sessions. There was enthusiasm for a definitive trial from participants, clinicians and singing group leaders perspectives based on positive experiences of trial involvement. Improvements to recruitment strategy, intervention structure, outcome measures and staffing were suggested. ConclusionA definitive RCT of SLH post-PR appears feasible, with acceptable uptake and completion rates. Trial RegistrationISRCTN11056049 What is already known on this topic?Singing for Lung Health(SLH) has previously been shown to improve health-related quality-of-life for people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Pulmonary Rehabilitation is a gold standard intervention, but it is not known whether SLH groups can be delivered as a maintenance programme after PR completion, or whether an RCT comparing this approach to usual care is feasible. What this study addsIt is feasible to conduct an RCT investigating the clinical and cost effectiveness of a 12-week SLH post PR maintenance programme compared with usual care. How this might affect research, practice or policyThis study will inform the design and delivery of a definitive RCT. The feasibility methodology used in this study can be applied to other creative health interventions which may be considered as maintenance options post-PR.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimised oxygenation improves functional capacity during daily activities in patients with COPD on long-term oxygen therapy – a randomised crossover trial 94%
- Long-Term Acceptability of Hygiene, Face Covering, and Social Distancing Interventions to Prevent Exacerbations in people living with Airways Diseases 92%
- Adrenaline (epinephrine) compared to selective beta-2-agonist in adults or children with acute asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigating the use of a one-page infographic to improve recruitment and retention to the BASIL+ Randomised Controlled Trial: A Study Within a Trial (SWAT) 94%
- Feasibility of individualized home exercise programs for patients with head and neck cancer – study protocol and first results of a multicentre single-arm intervention trial (OSHO #94) 94%
- Supervised and self-directed technology-based dual-task exercise training programme for older adults at risk of falling – Protocol for a feasibility study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Decision support system to evaluate VENTilation in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (DeVENT study) – Trial Protocol 93%
- Moderate-Intensity Exercise Versus High-Intensity Interval Training to Recover Walking Post-Stroke: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 92%
- The effect of osteotomy technique (flat-cut vs wedge-cut Weil) on pain relief and complication incidence following surgical treatment for patients presenting with metatarsalgia in a private metropolitan clinic: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.