MilkOligoCorpus: a semantically annotated resource for knowledge extraction on mammalian milk oligosaccharides
Rumeau, M.; Courtin, M.; Bossy, R.; Sauvion, C.; Loux, V.; Ba, M.; Knudsen, C.; Combes, S.; Nedellec, C.; Deleger, L.
Show abstract
Milk oligosaccharides are bioactive components that regulate the composition of the neonatal microbiota and exert immunomodulatory functions. Their beneficial effects depend on their structure. Numerous studies have shown intra- and inter-species variation in the structural composition and concentration of these compounds in mammalian milk, yet the biological significance of such variation remains poorly understood. Automated natural language processing methods are promising tools for extracting and gathering structured data from unstructured texts to get insight into the biological significance of milk oligosaccharide variation across mammals. These methods require training and evaluation on manually annotated text corpora. While annotated corpora exist for chemical substances, none are specifically designed for training natural language processing models to extract information on milk oligosaccharides. To this end, we propose MilkOligoCorpus, a new gold standard for milk oligosaccharide composition in mammalian species. MilkOligoCorpus annotation scheme is a rich entity/relation model designed to describe the diversity pattern of milk oligosaccharides according to female factor variability and to help better understand the structure-related function of milk oligosaccharides. MilkOligoCorpus consists of 30 PubMed texts fully annotated with entities related to individuals, samples, oligosaccharides and oligosaccharide quantification linked by binary and n-ary relationships. To address data interoperability across disparate publications and databases, four terminological resources were also developed to assign unique identifiers to the entities, supported by external ontologies. This paper presents the creation of the MilkOligoCorpus and its associated schema, along with the development of annotation guidelines and terminological resources. We also present experimental results obtained by baseline information extraction models on the corpus.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Extraction of biological terms using large language models enhances the usability of metadata in the BioSample database 93%
- FAIR Data Station for Lightweight Metadata Management & Validation of Omics Studies 93%
- Quantitative monitoring of nucleotide sequence data from genetic resources in context of their citation in the scientific literature 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.