Unravelling Sex Differences in the Genetic Architecture of Anxiety: A Genome-Wide Association Study in the UK Biobank
Hu, J.; Lupton, M. K.; Byrne, E. M.; Martin, N. G.; Whiteman, D. C.; Olsen, C. M.; Thomas, J. T.; Grasby, K. L.; Mitchell, B. L.
Show abstract
Anxiety disorders show striking sex differences in prevalence, symptoms, and clinical characteristics, shaping how they manifest and are experienced. Here, we report the first sex-specific meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of anxiety, leveraging two of the largest biobank datasets, UK Biobank and All of Us, comprising 85,014 female cases with 130,817 controls and 36,724 male cases with 117,044 controls. Functional annotation, sex-specific polygenic scores (PGS), and genetic correlations were performed to assess genetic differences and functional implications. In females, 26 lead SNPs were significantly associated with anxiety, compared to six in males. Among these, seven lead SNPs in females and five in males demonstrated significantly different effect sizes across sexes. Although the genetic correlation between sexes was high, it was significantly different from one, indicating partially distinct genetic architectures. In addition, both the SNP-based observed and liability-scale heritabilities (assuming a 2:1 female-to-male prevalence ratio) were significantly higher in females. Gene-based tests and functional prioritization identified different genes associated with anxiety in females and males. Moreover, genetic correlation analyses revealed stronger associations of female anxiety with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and body mass index (BMI), whereas male anxiety showed stronger correlations with waist-hip-ratio adjusted BMI. While the overall genetic architecture of anxiety is largely shared, our findings reveal distinct sex-specific genetic associations and correlations, highlighting the value of analysing the sexes separately to uncover genetic signals that may be masked in sex-combined samples.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Exposome-wide gene-environment interaction study of psychotic experiences in the UK Biobank 93%
- Shared genetic factors do not account for the observed co-occurrence of depression and autoimmune diseases in the UK Biobank 92%
- Genome-wide by environment interaction study of stressful life events and hospital-treated depression in the iPSYCH2012 sample 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The genetic architecture of obsessive-compulsive disorder: alleles across the frequency spectrum contribute liability to OCD 94%
- Reproducible Risk Loci and Psychiatric Comorbidities in Anxiety: Results from ~200,000 Million Veteran Program Participants 94%
- Genetic underpinnings of the transition from alcohol consumption to alcohol use disorder: shared and unique genetic architectures in a cross-ancestry sample 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome-wide association analysis reveals extensive genetic overlap between mood instability and psychiatric disorders but divergent patterns of genetic effects 94%
- "The Heidelberg Five" Personality Dimensions: Genome-wide Associations, Polygenic Risk for Neuroticism, and Psychopathology 20 Years after Assessment 94%
- Distinguishing Happiness and Meaning in Life from Depressive Symptoms: a GWAS-by-subtraction study in the UK Biobank 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.