WISER: an innovative and efficient method for correcting population structure in omics-based selection and association studies
Jacquin, L. J.; Guerra, W.; Lewandowski, M.; Patocchi, A.; Rymenants, M.; Durel, C.-E.; Laurens, F.; Aranzana, M. J.; Muranty, H.
Show abstract
This work introduces WISER (whitening and successive least squares estimation refinement), an innovative and efficient method designed to enhance phenotype estimation by addressing population structure. WISER outperforms traditional methods such as least squares (LS) means and best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) in phenotype estimation, offering a more accurate approach for omics-based selection and association studies. Unlike existing approaches which correct for population structure, WISER offers a generalized framework that can be applied across diverse experimental setups, species, and omics datasets, such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), and metabolomics. Within its framework, WISER extends classical methods that use eigen-information as fixed-effect covariates to correct for population structure, by relaxing their assumptions and implementing a true whitening matrix instead of a pseudo-whitening matrix. This approach corrects fixed effects (e.g., environmental effects) for the genetic covariance structure embedded within the experimental design, thereby removing confounding factors between fixed and genetic effects. To support its practical application, a user-friendly R package named wiser has been developed. The WISER method has been employed in analyses for genomic prediction and heritability estimation across four species and 33 traits using multiple datasets, including rice, maize, apple, and Scots pine. Results indicate that genomic predictive abilities based on WISER-estimated phenotypes consistently outperform the LS-means and BLUP approaches for phenotype estimation, regardless of the predictive model applied. This underscores WISERs potential to advance omics analyses and related research fields by capturing stronger genetic signals.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Accounting for epistasis improves genomic prediction of phenotypes with univariate and bivariate models across environments 97%
- The usefulness of multi-parent multi-environment QTL analysis: an illustration in different NAM populations 96%
- Assessing the response to genomic selection by simulation 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genomic Prediction in Family Bulks Using Different Traits and Cross-Validations in Pine 96%
- Genomic predictive ability for foliar nutritive traits in perennial ryegrass 96%
- Interpretable Artificial Neural Networks incorporating Bayesian Alphabet Models for Genome-wide Prediction and Association Studies 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.