Back

Diversity, abundance, and biogeography of CO2 fixing microorganisms in peatlands

Le Geay, M.; Mayers, K.; Sytiuk, A.; Dorrepaal, E.; Kuttim, M.; Lamentowicz, M.; Tuittila, E.-S.; Lauga, B.; Jassey, V. E.

2025-02-07 microbiology
10.1101/2025.02.07.637021 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Microbial communities play a crucial role in the carbon (C) dynamic of peatlands-- a major terrestrial C reservoir. While heterotrophic microorganisms attracted much attention over the past decades due to their role in peatland greenhouse gases emissions, CO2 fixing microorganisms (CFMs) remained particularly overlooked. Here, by leveraging metabarcoding and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR), we provide a comprehensive survey of CFM communities, including oxygenic phototrophs, chemoautotrophs and aerobic anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria (AAnPBs), in different peatland types. We demonstrate that CFMs are very abundant and diverse in peatlands, with on average 1021 CFMs contributing up to 40% of the total bacterial abundance. In particular, we show that oxygenic phototrophs (mostly Cyanophyceae and Palmophylloceae) are the most abundant CFMs, closely followed by chemoautotrophs (Proteobacteria) and AAnPBs (Vulcanimicrobiia). Using a joint-species distribution model, we further find that CFMs aggregate into six major clusters with different niche size. These clusters constitute the core and specific CFM microbiome. The core microbiome, which the occurrence is strongly influenced by temperature and nutrients, directly modulate the diversity and abundance of CFMs. Our findings highlight the importance of CFM diversity and abundance in peatlands, further reveal their complex structuration in link with environmental conditions and suggest that changes in environmental conditions could shift CFMs communities. These results are the foundation to better understand the role of CFMs for the peatland C cycle inputs.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.