Regional heterogeneity in the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for heart transplant after 2018 allocation policy change
Schumer, E.; Endo, T.; Wada, T.; Schilling, J. D.; Kotkar, K.; Masood, M.; Pawale, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe 2018 heart transplant allocation policy has changed the profile of patients receiving heart transplant, with an increased use of acute mechanical support and decreased use of durable left ventricular assist devices. We investigated the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use pre- and post-allocation change. MethodsUsing the UNOS database, we identified adult patients who underwent heart transplant from January, 2006 - June, 2022. The study time period was divided into pre- and post-allocation change. We divided ECMO patients by region and analyzed change in the rate of ECMO use by region between eras. Differences between groups and survival comparison were analyzed. ResultsA total of 41,636 recipients were found, of which 891 (2.1%) were on ECMO at the time of transplant. Overall ECMO use increased from 231 (0.8%) to 660 (5.5%) between eras (p<0.001). There was significant regional variation in the rate of ECMO usage (p<0.001) and significant differences in postoperative dialysis (p=0.014) and acute rejection episodes (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in pacemaker rate (p=0.172), stroke (p=0.212), treatment for rejection within 1 year (p=0.358), or post-transplant survival in the current era between regions for patients on ECMO at the time of transplant (p=0.444). ConclusionThere is increased utilization of ECMO following implementation of an allocation system which prioritizes ECMO recipients on the waitlist and there is a differential increase in the use of ECMO in various regions. Further granular studies are needed to see which patients may benefit more from ECMO and what can be done to reduce post-transplant mortality from ECMO to transplant as it remains high before and after allocation change.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in Mechanical Circulatory Support utilization, Left Ventricular Assist Device implantation and Transplant during Cardiogenic Shock Hospitalizations, after the New Heart Allocation Policy 95%
- Inpatient Outcomes Of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices and Bridging to Transplantation in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy 95%
- Early left ventricular systolic function is a more sensitive predictor of adverse events after heart transplant 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors of successful weaning from Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (V-A ECMO): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 94%
- Predicting factors for long-term survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest - a propensity score-matched analysis 94%
- Effects of low versus high inspired oxygen fraction on myocardial injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A randomized clinical trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Centhaquine Increases Stroke Volume and Cardiac Output in Patients with Hypovolemic Shock 92%
- Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation among Cancer Patients: Utilization Trends and In-Hospital Outcomes 92%
- Screening for Right Ventricular Dysfunction in the Emergency Department Using a Smartphone ECG Analysis Application: An External Validation Study with Acute Pulmonary Embolism Patients 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Benefit and Risk of Endomyocardial Biopsy for Heart Transplant Patients in the Contemporary Era 92%
- Interactive web application for plotting personalized prognosis prediction curves in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation using machine learning 88%
- Perfusate metabolomics content and tubular transporters expression during kidney graft preservation by hypothermic machine perfusion 88%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.