Machine Learning Models for Dynamic Assessment of Extubation Readiness in Pediatric Critical Care
Liu, Y.; Cuevas-Asturias, S.; Alexander, E. C.; Ormond, J.; Aw, T. C.; Aramburo, A.; Ray, S.; Faisal, A. A.; Ramnarayan, P.
Show abstract
ImportanceDetermining the optimal timing for extubation in critically ill children remains challenging, with premature extubation leading to increased morbidity and mortality, while prolonged ventilation exposes patients to ventilator-associated complications. ObjectiveTo develop and validate machine learning models for dynamic assessment of extubation failure risk (nowcasting) and extubation readiness (forecasting) in mechanically ventilated children. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsRetrospective cohort study using electronic health records from two pediatric intensive care units in London, UK (2013-2022), including 3,815 ventilation episodes in children aged 0-17 years. Exposure(s)Mechanical ventilation via endotracheal tube using pressure control-BIPAP (PC) or spontaneous pressure support CPAP (PS) modes. Main outcomes and measuresPrimary outcomes were extubation failure (requiring reintubation within 48 hours) and extubation readiness (successful extubation within 12 hours). Both models incorporated demographic, physiological, ventilation, and medication data, with varying historical context lengths to optimize prediction accuracy. ResultsThe median age of children in the study cohort (n=3815 ventilation episodes) was 8.0 months (56.2% male); extubation failure occurred in 315/3815 (8.3%). The nowcasting model achieved an area-under-the-receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.77. The forecasting model reached an AUROC of 0.85. Ventilation parameters dominated the nowcasting model, while medication response and patient characteristics drove the forecasting model. Conclusions and RelevanceOur dual-model approach offers a structured framework for extubation decision-making in critically ill children, combining continuous monitoring of readiness with snapshot assessment of extubation failure risk. Prospective validation is needed; however, this strategy may help clinicians optimize the timing of ventilation liberation within pediatric intensive care.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of intensive care unit severity scoring systems across different ethnicities. 93%
- Remote Covid Assessment in Primary Care (RECAP) risk prediction tool: derivation and real-world validation studies 93%
- Real-world evaluation of AI-driven COVID-19 triage for emergency admissions: External validation & operational assessment of lab-free and high-throughput screening solutions 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of physiological adverse events using continuous vital signs monitoring during paediatric critical care transport: a novel data-driven approach 96%
- Predictability and Stability Testing to Assess Clinical Decision Instrument Performance for Children After Blunt Torso Trauma 94%
- Community-acquired pneumonia identification from electronic health records in the absence of a gold standard: a Bayesian latent class analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of automated computer aided-risk score for predicting the risk of in-hospital mortality using first electronically recorded blood test results and vital signs for COVID-19 hospital admissions: a retrospective development and validation study 94%
- Identification of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome subphenotypes denovo using routine clinical data: a retrospective analysis of ARDS clinical trials 93%
- Development and validation of a clinical risk score to predict SARS-CoV-2 infection in emergency department patients: The CCEDRRN COVID-19 Infection Score (CCIS) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- An international factorial vignette-based survey of intubation decisions in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure 94%
- Prone positioning of non-intubated patients with COVID-19 - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 92%
- Prone Positioning in a North American Cohort of Hypoxemic Patients on Mechanical Ventilation 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.