Back

Exploring multidrug resistance patterns in community-acquired E. coli urinary tract infections with machine learning

Hodbert, E.; Lemenand, O.; Thibaut, S.; Coeffic, T.; Boutoille, D.; Corvec, S.; Birgand, G.; Temime, L.

2025-02-08 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.02.05.25321745 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundWhile associations of antibiotic resistance traits are not random in multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria, clinically relevant resistance patterns remain relatively underexplored. This study used machine learning, specifically association-set mining, to explore resistance associations within E. coli isolates from community-acquired urinary tract infections (UTIs). MethodsWe analysed antibiograms of community-acquired E. coli UTI isolates collected from 2018 to 2022 by Frances national surveillance system. Association-set mining was applied separately to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing E. coli (ESBL-EC) and non-ESBL-EC. MDR patterns that had expected support (reflecting pattern frequency) and conditional lift (reflecting association strength) higher than expected by chance (p-value[≤]0.05) were used to construct resistance networks, and analysed according to time, age and gender. FindingsThe number of isolates increased from 360 287 in 2018 (10 150 ESBL-EC, 350 137 non-ESBL-EC) to 629 017 in 2022 (18 663 ESBL-EC, 610 354 non-ESBL-EC). More MDR patterns were selected in ESBL-EC than non-ESBL-EC (2022: 1770 vs 93 patterns), with higher respective network densities (2022: 0.230 vs 0.074). Fluoroquinolone, third-generation cephalosporin and penicillin resistances were strongly associated in ESBL-EC. The median densities of resistance association networks increased from 2018 to 2022 in both ESBL-EC (0.238 to 0.302, p-value=0.06, Pearson test) and non-ESBL-EC (0.074 to 0.100, p-value=0.04). Across all years, median network densities were higher in men than women in both ESBL-EC (2022: 0.305 vs 0.276) and non-ESBL-EC (2022: 0.128 vs 0.094); they were also higher in individuals over 65 years old than under 65 in ESBL-EC (2022: 0.289 vs 0.275) and non-ESBL-EC (2022: 0.103 vs 0.088). InterpretationThese findings, which show increasing MDR associations, especially in men and older individuals, highlight the importance of ongoing resistance surveillance to understand the future evolution of resistance patterns. FundingThis work received funding from the French government through the National Research Agency project COMBINE ANR-22-PAMR-0003. Research in contextO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSWe searched Pubmed for previously published articles without any date or language restrictions using the search terms (multiresistan* OR "multidrug-resistan*") AND ("data mining" OR "machine learning" OR "artificial intelligence") AND (pattern* OR associat*). We found three studies that used machine learning to identify multiresistance patterns in various pathogens (chicken-associated Escherichia coli, human-associated Staphylococcus aureus and cattle-associated Salmonella enterica) in the United States. However, to our knowledge, no machine-learning studies to date have explored multiresistance patterns in human-associated Enterobacterales, especially within European contexts. Added value of this studyOur study provided a novel and detailed analysis of multiresistance patterns in community-acquired E. coli urinary tract infection collected from a French national surveillance system. Our findings confirmed that association-set mining is effective for identifying resistance associations in antibiotic resistance surveillance data. We explored the temporal evolution of resistance associations, gender-specific and age-specific differences, which to our knowledge, had not been previously analysed. Implications of all the available evidenceOur results suggest a temporal increase of resistance associations in community-acquired E. coli UTI and identify key patterns in different subpopulations. In the context of rising antibiotic resistance, optimizing the use of current medications is crucial, as few new antibiotics have been developed in the past two decades. With further research, this work could provide insight for targeted antibiotic stewardship strategies.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
3
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.0%
4
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
5
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.7%
7
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
8
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.9%
10
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
11
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
12
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
14
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
15
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.9%
16
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
17
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
18
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
19
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
20
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
21
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
22
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
23
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
24
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
25
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
26
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
27
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
28
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
29
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
30
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%