Enhancing protein graph representations through static-dynamic fusion
Guo, P.; Correia, B.; Vandergheynst, P.; Probst, D.
Show abstract
Machine learning for protein modeling faces significant challenges due to proteins inherently dynamic nature, yet most graph-based machine learning methods rely solely on static structural information. Recently, the growing availability of molecular dynamics trajectories provides new opportunities for understanding the dynamic behavior of proteins; however, computational methods for utilizing this dynamic information remain limited. We propose a novel graph representation that integrates both static structural information and dynamic correlations from molecular dynamics trajectories, enabling more comprehensive modeling of proteins. By applying relational graph neural networks (RGNNs) to process this heterogeneous representation, we demonstrate significant improvements over structure-based approaches across three distinct tasks: atomic adaptability prediction, binding site detection, and binding affinity prediction. Our results validate that combining static and dynamic information provides complementary signals for understanding proteinligand interactions, offering new possibilities for drug design and structural biology applications.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Gated Graph Transformer for Protein ComplexStructure Quality Assessment and its Performancein CASP15 96%
- Improving sequence-based modeling of protein families using secondary structure quality assessment 96%
- From Atoms to Fragments: A Coarse Representation for Functional and Efficient Protein Design 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- All-Atom Protein Sequence Design using Discrete Diffusion Models 96%
- Sequence-based Drug-Target Complex Pre-training Enhances Protein-Ligand Binding Process Predictions Tackling Crypticity 95%
- Structure-aware Protein Solubility Prediction From Sequence Through Graph Convolutional Network And Predicted Contact Map 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.