The impact of COVID-19 infection on social care use in people over 50 years of age: a matched cohort study
Butfield, R.; Bray, B. D.; Quint, J.; Castanon, A.; Adesanya, E.; Chen, S.; Russell, R.
Show abstract
ObjectivesTo estimate the impact of COVID-19 infection on the requirement for social care services among adults aged [≥]50 years in North-West London. DesignPopulation based matched cohort study using linked routinely collected electronic social care, primary care and hospital records (the Discover dataset). SettingApproximately 4.7 million people with a general practitioner record in North-West London. Participants150,654 adults aged [≥]50 years with a first diagnosis of COVID-19 between January 2020 and February 2023 and 547,704 propensity score matched comparators without a COVID-19 diagnosis during the same period. Main outcome measuresSocial care use and associated costs overall and by specific type (care home, domiciliary care, respite care, social care assessments) stratified by age group, index year, diagnosis setting, severe COVID-19 risk status, frailty, and care home admission prior to index. Overall survival. ResultsA total of 9,174 (6.09%) individuals with COVID-19 required social care use (of any type) during follow up, 2.54 times (95%CI: 2.48-2.61; P<0.0001) higher than matched comparators (n=13,126, 2.40%). The difference was largest for care home admission; individuals with COVID-19 had 4.10 (95%CI: 3.87-4.36; P<0.0001) times the risk of a care home admission and nearly twice the risk (risk ratio 1.94; 95%CI:1.86-2.02 P<0.0001) of domiciliary care during follow up compared with matched comparators. Individuals with COVID-19 experienced higher mortality, with 9.30% (14,005/547,704) dying during follow up compared with 3.76% (20,608/547,704) deaths among matched comparators. This increase in social care utilisation was observed for all age groups. Adults with COVID-19 had over four times higher social care costs than matched comparators ({pound}1,276 per person per year (pppy) versus {pound}276 pppy; mean difference +{pound}1000, 95%CI: {pound}947-{pound}1054, p<0.0001), with most of the costs due to care home admissions. Higher social care costs in individuals with COVID-19 compared with matched comparators were strongly age related, rising from a mean difference of {pound}130 pppy (95%CI: {pound}99-{pound}161) in those aged 50-64 to {pound}6108 pppy (95%CI: {pound}5613-{pound}6603) higher costs in those aged [≥] 85. ConclusionsCOVID-19 infection is associated with meaningfully higher social care requirements in the [≥]50 years population. Reducing the need for social care use and the associated costs of care should be one of the goals of interventions to reduce the risk and severity of COVID-19 infection.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of COVID-19 on Care-Home Mortality and Life Expectancy in Scotland 95%
- COVID-19 infection and attributable mortality in UK care homes: Cohort study using active surveillance and electronic records (March-June 2020) 95%
- COVID-19 risk factors amongst 14,786 care home residents: An observational longitudinal analysis including daily community positive test rates of COVID-19, hospital stays, and vaccination status in Wales (UK) between 1st September 2020 and 1st May 2021. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inequalities in healthcare disruptions during the Covid-19 pandemic: Evidence from 12 UK population-based longitudinal studies 95%
- Identifying markers of health-seeking behaviour and healthcare access in UK electronic health records 95%
- Acute and long-term impacts of COVID-19 on economic vulnerability: a population-based longitudinal study (COVIDENCE UK) 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Epidemiology of post-COVID syndrome following hospitalisation with coronavirus: a retrospective cohort study 94%
- Risk Of Hospitalisation With COVID-19 Among Teachers Compared To Healthcare Workers And Other Working-Age Adults. A Nationwide Case-Control Study 93%
- Risk of COVID-19 related deaths for SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (B.1.1.529) compared with Delta (B.1.617.2) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- An external validation of the QCovid risk prediction algorithm for risk of mortality from COVID-19 in adults: national validation cohort study in England 95%
- COVID-19 collateral: Indirect acute effects of the pandemic on physical and mental health in the UK 95%
- Understanding COVID-19 trajectories from a nationwide linked electronic health record cohort of 56 million people: phenotypes, severity, waves & vaccination 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- High prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in care homes affected by COVID-19; a prospective cohort study in England 93%
- SARS-Cov-2 prevalence, transmission, health-related outcomes and control strategies in homeless shelters: systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- Temporal trends in primary care-recorded self-harm during and beyond the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic: time series analysis of electronic healthcare records for 2.8 million patients in the Greater Manchester Care Record 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.