Back

Integrating a conceptual consent permission model from the informed consent ontology for software application execution

Amith, M.; He, Y.; Smith, E.; Harris, M.; Manion, F.; Tao, C.

2025-02-02 health informatics
10.1101/2025.01.31.25321503 medRxiv
Show abstract

We developed a simulated process to show a software implementation to facilitate an approach to integrate the Informed Consent Ontology, a reference ontology of informed consent information, to express implicit description and implement conceptual permission from informed consent life cycle. An early study introduced an experimental method to use Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) to describe and represent permissions to computational deduce more information from the Informed Consent Ontology (ICO), demonstrated by the use of the All of Us informed consent documents. We show how incomplete information in informed consent documents can be elucidated using a computational model of permissions toward health information technology that integrates ontologies. Future goals entail applying our computational approach for specific sub-domains of the informed consent life cycle, specifically for vaccine informed consent.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
○ 43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
○ 47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.7%
Similar papers in this journal
3
JAMIA Open
◐ 42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
Similar papers in this journal
4
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 21%
7.8%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
◐ 71 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.2%
Similar papers in this journal
6
JMIR Medical Informatics
◐ 18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
DIGITAL HEALTH
○ 17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
8
GigaScience
◐ 212 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
9
Frontiers in Digital Health
○ 24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
10
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.4%
11
International Journal of Medical Informatics
○ 26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
12
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
● 15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
13
BMC Medical Research Methodology
○ 47 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
14
Journal of Medical Internet Research
◐ 87 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Bioinformatics
◐ 1204 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
16
Scientific Data
○ 209 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
Frontiers in Public Health
○ 148 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
18
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
○ 22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Physiology
○ 106 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
PLOS Digital Health
● 106 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
21
JMIR Research Protocols
◐ 21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
22
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
○ 28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
23
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
○ 21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
24
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.8%
25
Computers in Biology and Medicine
○ 128 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
26
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.8%
27
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
○ 128 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
28
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
○ 20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
29
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
○ 17 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
30
Database
◐ 61 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.