Psychosis-linked Symptoms and Structural Brain Patterns in Cognitive Subgroups among Familial High-Risk Children in the ABCD Study
Turkozer, H. B.; Karcher, N. R.; Clauss, J.; Nordentoft, M.; Lewandowski, K. E.; Roffman, J. L.; Ongur, D.
Show abstract
ObjectiveChildren at familial high risk for psychosis (FHR) are at substantially increased risk for psychotic disorders and other serious mental illnesses. Identifying risk subgroups within FHR youth may enhance prediction models to identify children at greatest risk for potential intervention. This study investigated psychosis-linked symptoms and structural brain patterns in neurocognitive subgroups among FHR children in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study using baseline, 2-year, and 4-year follow-up data. MethodsAmong children with first- and second-degree family history of psychosis, neurocognitive subgroups were defined using NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery baseline age-corrected total scores: children with low (FHR-LC, 0-33%, n=234), moderate (FHR-MC, 33-66%, n=261), and high (FHR-HC, 66-100%, n=277) cognitive performance. Psychiatric symptoms were assessed using Prodromal Questionnaire-Brief Child Version (PQ-BC) and Childhood Behavior Checklist (CBCL). Regional vulnerability indices (SSD-RVIs), which quantify the similarity of participants structural brain patterns to the patterns found in adults with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, were calculated using cortical thickness measures following rigorous quality control. ResultsAt baseline, FHR-LC had significantly higher PQ-BC and CBCL scores, and trend-level higher SSD-RVIs compared to FHR-HC. Longitudinally, PQ-BC and CBCL scores decreased with age across all FHR participants, while SSD-RVIs remained stable. No longitudinal cognitive subgroup-by-age interactions were observed, indicating that subgroup differences persisted over time. ConclusionChildren at FHR who have concurrent poor cognitive performance exhibit elevated and stable clinical and imaging psychosis risk markers. This suggests that they may represent a risk subgroup with elevated vulnerability, presenting an opportunity for early identification and intervention.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cerebral cortical alterations in adolescent early-onset psychosis: a surface-based morphometry mega-analysis 96%
- Interrelations Between Dopaminergic-, GABAergic- and Glutamatergic Neurotransmitters in Antipsychotic-Naïve Psychosis Patients and the Association to Initial Treatment Response 96%
- Cortical and Subcortical Neuroanatomical Signatures of Schizotypy in 3,004 Individuals Assessed in a Worldwide ENIGMA Study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Central oxidative stress and early vocational outcomes in first episode psychosis: A 7-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy study of glutathione 96%
- Altered sex differences in hippocampal subfield volumes in schizophrenia 95%
- Reassessing Asymmetry Reduction in Psychosis: Cingulate Folding and Gyrification Covariance in Patients with Auditory Hallucinations 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multivariate Resting-State Functional Connectivity Features Linked to Transdiagnostic Psychopathology in Early Psychosis 95%
- 40 Hz Auditory Steady-State Responses Predict Clinical Outcomes in Clinical-High-Risk Participants: A MEG Study 95%
- Altered neurobehavioral reward response predicts psychotic-like experiences in youth exposed to cannabis prenatally 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Early visual processing as a marker of disease, not vulnerability: Event-related potential (ERP) evidence from 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, a population at high risk for schizophrenia 95%
- Altered white matter microstructure of language pathways and semantic cognition deficiencies in early psychosis 95%
- Neurobiology-based Cognitive Biotypes Using Multi-scale Intrinsic Connectivity Networks in Psychotic Disorders 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.