Optimising covariate allocation at design stage using Fisher Information Matrix for Non-Linear Mixed Effects Models in pharmacometrics
Fayette, L.; Brendel, K.; Mentre, F.
Show abstract
This work focuses on designing experiments for pharmacometrics studies analysed by Non-Linear Mixed Effects Models (NLMEM) including covariates to describe inter-individual variability. Co-variate effects may help identify patient subpopulations at risk of sub-therapeutic or toxic responses, for instance when hepatic or renal impairment reduces drug elimination, increasing safety risks. Before collecting and modelling new clinical trial data, choosing an appropriate design is crucial, particularly to ensure sufficient information to estimate covariate effects and their uncertainty. Assuming a known NLMEM with covariate effects and a joint distribution for covariates in the target population from previous clinical studies, we propose to optimise the allocation of covariates among the subjects to be included in a new trial. It aims achieving better overall parameter estimations and therefore increase power of statistical tests on covariate effects to detect the clinical relevance or non-relevance of relationships. We used the Fisher Information Matrix and developed a fast and deterministic computation method, leveraging Gaussian quadrature and copula modelling. We suggested dividing the domain of continuous covariates into clinically meaningful intervals and optimised their proportions, along with the proportion of each category for the discrete covariates. The optimisation problem was formulated as a convex problem subject to linear constraints, allowing resolution using Projected Gradient Descent algorithm. Different scenarios for a pharmacokinetics model including either biological measurements of renal or hepatic function as covariate were explored. We showed that covariate optimisation reduces the number of subjects needed to achieve desired power in covariate tests for relevance or non-relevance. HighlightsO_LIFisher Information Matrix in nonlinear mixed effects models (NLMEM) with covariates C_LIO_LINew computation method of Information Matrix using copula and Gaussian quadrature C_LIO_LIOptimisation of covariate allocation using partitioning and projected gradient C_LIO_LIReduced sample size needed to detect clinically relevant covariate in a PK example C_LI
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- External control arm analysis: an evaluation of propensity score approaches, G-computation, and doubly debiased machine learning 95%
- Prediction-powered Inference for Clinical Trials 95%
- Comparison of Bayesian networks, G-estimation and linear models to estimate causal treatment effects in aggregated N-of-1 trials 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Applying Historical Data in a Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Model Can Reduce the Number of Control Rats Required for Calculation of the Relative Potency of Insulin Analogues 93%
- Testing gene-environment interactions for rare and/or common variants in sequencing association studies 93%
- Optimization of nutritional strategies using a mechanistic computational model in prediabetes: Application to the J-DOIT1 study data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Stability-Enhanced Lasso Approach for Covariate Selection in Non-Linear Mixed Effect Model 95%
- Penalized reduced rank regression for multi-outcome survival data supports a common metabolic risk score for age-related diseases 95%
- Two-phase sample selection strategies for design and analysis in post-genome wide association fine-mapping studies 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Combining symbolic regression with the Cox proportional hazards model improves prediction of heart failure deaths 93%
- On the predictability of postoperative complications for cancer patients: a Portuguese cohort study 91%
- Development and Validation of ‘Patient Optimizer’ (POP) Algorithms for Predicting Surgical Risk with Machine Learning 90%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.