Back

GeNePi: a GPU-enhanced Next Generation Bioinformatics Pipeline for Whole Genome Sequencing Analysis

Marangoni, S.; Furia, F.; Charrance, D.; Fant, A.; Di Dio, S.; Trova, S.; Spirito, G.; Musacchia, F.; Coppe, A.; Gustincich, S.; Cavalli, A.; Vecchi, M.; Landuzzi, F.

2025-02-03 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.01.30.635645 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) has revolutionized genome biology, enabling the rapid sequencing of an entire human genome and facilitating the integration of Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) into both research and clinical applications. The high-throughput nature of NGS and the complex data processing required has driven the need for advanced computational infrastructures to analyse these large datasets. The aim of this work is to introduce an innovative bioinformatic pipeline, named GeNePi, for the efficient and precise analysis of WGS short paired-end reads. Built on the Nextflow framework with a modular structure, GeNePi incorporates GPU-accelerated algorithms and supports multiple work-flow configurations. The pipeline automates the extraction of biologically relevant insights from raw WGS data, including: disease-related variants such as single nucleotide variants (SNVs), small insertions or deletions (INDELs), copy number variants (CNVs), and structural variants (SVs). Optimized for high-performance computing (HPC) environments, it takes advantage of job-scheduler submissions, parallelised processing, and tailored resource allocation for each analysis step. Tested on synthetic and real datasets, GeNePi accurately identifies genomic variants, with performances comparable to that of state-of-art tools. These features make GeNePi a valuable instrument for large-scale analyses in both research and clinical contexts, representing a key step towards the establishment of National Centers for Computational and Technological Medicine.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.