Back

Exploring the Role of PEDOT Electrodes in Electrostimulation of vascular endothelial cells

Vitecek, J.; Kratochvil, M.; Weiter, M.

2025-02-01 cell biology
10.1101/2025.01.30.635422 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The potential of electrical stimulation for cell control in tissue engineering remains largely underestimated, as does the use of organic semiconductors. The tunable physico-chemical properties of organic semiconductors offer advantages over commonly used inert metals. This study investigates the effects of pulsed electrostimulation and electrode materials, gold and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT), on the physiological functionality of human vascular endothelial cells. A novel electrostimulation platform incorporating gold or PEDOT electrodes was developed and characterized for electrical performance. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells were cultured on this platform, and the effects of electrostimulation and electrode material were assessed through morphological analysis, nitric oxide (NO) production, and expression of key endothelial marker genes. PEDOT electrodes produced higher electrical current during electrostimulation. Interestingly, cell morphology, including elongation and alignment, showed minimal changes under electrostimulation. NO production, a key marker of vascular health, was enhanced by electrostimulation, with PEDOT electrodes showing a trend toward greater NO accumulation than gold. Gene expression analysis revealed material- and stimulation-specific trends: electrostimulation generally upregulated KLF2, KLF4, and CYP1B1 on PEDOT electrodes but suppressed their expression on gold electrodes. These findings suggest that PEDOT electrodes, with their enhanced electrochemical properties and ability to support endothelial functionality, provide a safe and efficient platform for endothelial cell electrostimulation. This study advances understanding of the interplay between material properties and electrostimulation and highlights PEDOT as a promising candidate for vascular tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.1%
2
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
3
Chemical Engineering Journal
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
5
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
6
Journal of Nanobiotechnology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
10
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
11
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
12
Advanced Materials Interfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
13
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.1%
14
RSC Advances
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
15
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
16
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
18
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
19
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
20
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
21
Biomaterials Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
22
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
23
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
24
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
25
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
26
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
28
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
29
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
30
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%