Segmentation-Free Pretherapeutic Assessment of BRAF-Status in Pediatric Low-Grade Gliomas
Kudus, K.; Wagner, M.; Sheng, M.; Bennett, J.; Liu, A.; tabori, U.; Hawkins, C.; ertl-wagner, B.; Khalvati, F.
Show abstract
BackgroundBRAF status is crucial for treating pediatric low-grade gliomas (pLGG) and can be assessed non-invasively from segmented tumor regions on MRI using machine learning (ML). However, there are inherent limitations to manual and automated tumor segmentations. PurposeTo assess the performance of automated segmentation algorithms and to develop and assess a segmentation-free ML classification pipeline that identifies BRAF status from whole-brain FLAIR MRI sequences. Materials and MethodsIn this REB-approved retrospective study, molecularly-characterized tumors and whole-brain FLAIR MR images were collected from 455 patients with pLGG treated between 1999 and 2023 at a single tertiary care childrens hospital. We trained and evaluated three medical segmentation models, TransBTS, MedNeXt, and MedicalNet. Next, we developed a model to identify BRAF status from whole-brain FLAIR MRI, without any reliance on manual or automated segmentations. We then implemented a novel pretraining regimen that embedded segmentation knowledge into the whole-brain FLAIR MRI classification model. Finally, we trained and evaluated a baseline model that used manual segmentations as inputs. All ML models were trained and evaluated under a nested-cross validation scheme, and mean performance across all test folds was compared using the corresponding t-test. ResultsThe MedNeXt segmentation model (mean Dice score: 0.555) outperformed both the convolutional neural network (CNN) based MedicalNet (0.516) and the CNN-transformer hybrid TransBTS (0.449) (p <0.05 for all comparisons). The MedNeXt style classification model achieved a one-vs-rest area under the ROC curve of 0.741 using the whole brain FLAIR sequence as an input, without any segmentation knowledge. This was improved to 0.772 through pretraining on the segmentation task, which was not significantly different from the baseline manual segmentation-based model (0.756, p-value: 0.141). ConclusionBRAF status can be assessed non-invasively using ML models based on whole-brain FLAIR sequences. Dependence on inconsistent manual or automated segmentations can be reduced by integrating tumor region information into the model through pretraining.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Novel Fully Automated MRI-Based Deep Learning Method For Classification Of 1p/19q Co-Deletion Status In Brain Gliomas 98%
- Automated Tumor Segmentation and Brain Tissue Extraction from Multiparametric MRI of Pediatric Brain Tumors: A Multi-Institutional Study 97%
- Pediatric brain tumor classification using deep learning on MR-images with age fusion 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep neural networks allow expert-level brain meningioma detection, segmentation and improvement of current clinical practice 97%
- ANTsX: A dynamic ecosystem for quantitative biological and medical imaging 94%
- Association of Graph-based Spatial Features with Overall Survival Status of Glioblastoma Patients 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The relationship between pathological brain activity and functional network connectivity in glioma patients 92%
- Early Imaging Marker of Progressive Glioblastoma: a window of opportunity 90%
- Predicting attention deficits and functional recovery after glioma resection through functional executive networks: insights from dynamic properties 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perceptual super-resolution in multiple sclerosis MRI 94%
- MRI-based classification of neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus patients with self-supervised contrastive learning 92%
- Feasibility of FreeSurfer processing for T1-weighted brain images of 5-year-olds: semiautomated protocol of FinnBrain Neuroimaging Lab 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.