Back

Speech-in-noise discriminability after noise exposure: Insights from a gerbil model of acoustic trauma

Jüchter, C.; Beutelmann, R.; Klump, G. M.

2025-01-30 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.01.29.635515 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Exposure to loud sounds can lead to hearing impairments. Speech comprehension, especially in the presence of background sounds, allegedly declines as a consequence of noise-induced hearing loss. However, the connection between noise overexposure and deteriorated speech-in-noise perception is not clear yet and potential underlying mechanisms are still under debate. This study investigates speech-in-noise discrimination in young-adult Mongolian gerbils before and after an acoustic trauma to reveal possible noise-induced changes in the perception of speech sounds and to examine the commonly suggested link between noise exposure and speech-in-noise perception difficulties. Nine young-adult gerbils were trained to discriminate a deviant consonant-vowel-consonant combination (CVC) or vowel-consonant-vowel combination (VCV) in a sequence of CVC or VCV standards, respectively. The logatomes were spoken by different speakers and masked by a steady-state speech-shaped noise. After the gerbils completed the behavioral baseline experiments, they underwent an acoustic trauma and collected data for the second time in the behavioral experiments. Applying multidimensional scaling, response latencies were used to generate perceptual maps reflecting the gerbils internal representations of the sounds pre- and post-trauma. To evaluate how the discrimination of vowels and consonants was altered after the acoustic trauma, changes in response latencies between phoneme pairs were investigated with regard to their articulatory features. Auditory brainstem responses were measured to assess peripheral auditory function. We found that the perceptual maps of vowels and consonants were very similar before and after noise exposure. Interestingly, the gerbils overall vowel discrimination ability was improved after the acoustic trauma, even though the gerbils suffered from noise-induced hearing loss. In contrast to the improvements in vowel discrimination, there were only minor changes in the gerbils ability to discriminate consonants. Moreover, the noise exposure showed a differential influence on the response latencies for vowel and consonant discriminations depending on the articulatory features of the specific phonemes.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.2%
2
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
Hearing Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.6%
6
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.6%
7
Trends in Hearing
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
8
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.5%
9
Ear & Hearing
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
10
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
12
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
13
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
14
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%
16
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
17
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
18
Current Research in Neurobiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.5%
19
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
20
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.5%
21
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%
22
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
23
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.5%