Back

Exploratory factor analysis as a validation tool in a questionnaire to evaluate the uptake of cataract surgery

Salowi, M. A.; Naing, N. N.; Ahmad Rosdi, H.; Wan Nawang, W. R.; Mustafa, N.; Sharudin, S. N.; Che Omar, N. A.; Mokhtar, A.

2025-01-31 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.01.29.25321326 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundExploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) evaluates construct validity by identifying underlying relationships among questionnaire items, helping determine the number of latent constructs. This study aimed to validate a newly developed questionnaire on cataract surgery uptake among the community by interviewing subjects aged 50 years and older. MethodsA bilingual questionnaire, based on theoretical factors of knowledge, perception, attitude, and practice, was developed through literature review and expert interviews. It underwent forward-backward translation, content validity, and face validity assessment, followed by discussions with panels of eye care experts. Data for EFA were collected through interviews with subjects aged 50 and older, who had visual acuity worse than 6/18 due to cataracts or had undergone cataract surgery. Responses were analyzed for factor loadings and reliability. Principal Axis Factoring (PAF) was used for factor extraction, initially based on Eigenvalues > 1, and later fixed at eight factors. Factors were rotated using Varimax with Kaiser Normalization. Items with weak factor loadings were removed iteratively, with re-analysis conducted after each removal. ResultsA total of 287 subjects were recruited and consented to EFA. All 40 items in the questionnaire (knowledge, attitude, perception and practice) were combined and analysed. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) test was 0.714, indicating that factor analysis was suitable for exploring the underlying structure. Bartletts test of Sphericity was highly significant (p < 0.001), indicating that the variables (questions) were sufficiently interrelated for factor analysis. Factors 3 and 7 had only two questions, although they showed fairly good loading with satisfactory correlation. The Cronbachs alpha reliability of all the factors varies from 0.50 to 0.72 (total = 0.72). The final questionnaire consisted of six factors and 22 questions. ConclusionsThe developed and validated questionnaire demonstrated an acceptable factor structure related to knowledge, attitude, perception, and practice in evaluating cataract surgery uptake. This tool provides a reliable method for assessing cataract surgery uptake in the community.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.