Back

Antimicrobial Resistance in Wildlife across Switzerland and the Principality of Liechtenstein: Associations with Environmental Factors and Taxonomic Variation

Hoecketstaller, K.; Marti, I.; Bank, C.; Yilmaz, B.; Becker, J.

2025-01-28 microbiology
10.1101/2025.01.28.635243 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) presents a significant challenge to global public health. Addressing this challenge requires a comprehensive One Health approach that integrates efforts in human, veterinary, and environmental domains. Whereas AMR research in medical and veterinary domains is extensive, AMR research in wildlife has received less attention. However, AMR prevalence in the environment, and specifically in wildlife, ultimately affects human life. In a large study conducted in Switzerland and the Principality of Liechtenstein, we collected 410 rectal swab samples from 37 different wildlife species to quantify the prevalence of Escherichia coli (E. coli) and its resistance to 16 antimicrobial drugs, determined through phenotypical antimicrobial susceptibility testing. The study yielded an 81.5% E. coli isolation rate with a considerable 10.8% of isolates resistant to one or more antimicrobial drugs. Notably, 4.5% of the isolates demonstrated multidrug resistance (MDR). Furthermore, we found that E. coli in omnivores exhibited the highest levels of AMR, significantly higher than in carnivores and herbivores. In addition to these dietary associations, we found that the percentage of forested areas surrounding the sampling locations was inversely related to AMR rates, suggesting that environmental conditions play a role in mitigating AMR. This study provides a large-scale quantification of AMR in a broad range of wildlife species and also identifies diverse patterns of AMR in E. coli, highlighting variations associated with both host species and environmental conditions. Our findings emphasize the role of wildlife as potential indicators of environmental contamination with antibiotics and as reservoirs of resistant bacteria.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
5
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
6
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
7
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
8
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
9
Journal of Applied Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
10
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
14
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
17
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
18
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
19
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
22
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
25
International Journal of Food Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
26
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
28
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.5%