Indoor air quality at a French university: a participatory CO2 measurement campaign highlights the wide gap between reality and the law
CINQUIN, P.
Show abstract
Poor indoor air quality has been demonstrated to increase the risk of transmitting infectious agents and to expose individuals to the phenomenon of sick building syndrome. In light of these findings, most countries have established specific guidelines regarding indoor air quality in university rooms. In France, for instance, the maximum permissible concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) in university rooms without mechanical ventilation is set at 1,300 parts per million (ppm), and the minimum volume per occupant is 15 m3. For rooms with mechanical ventilation, the minimum clean air flow rate is 25 m3/h/occupant. The primary objective of this study was to design and demonstrate the feasibility of a simple, cost-effective method for comparing the reality of indoor air quality in all university rooms with legal requirements. The secondary objectives of the present study were to demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed method in identifying and reporting problematic situations, and in issuing practical recommendations. Mobile CO2 sensors (Aranet4) were provided to volunteer lecturers to measure the CO2 concentration during and after classes. The number of occupants and the condition of openings were also recorded. These data were supplemented by measurements from 117 fixed Carbon Nexelec sensors. The data were then fitted to a model, which enabled the characterization of air quality and the estimation of the gauge reduction required to comply with the law. None of the 14 rooms without mechanical ventilation complied with the legal minimum of 15 m3/occupant. 75% of the third quartiles of CO2 concentrations during classes exceeded 2692 ppm. In rooms with mechanical ventilation, median clean air flow was 15 m3/h/occupant at 100% occupancy (9 m3/h/occupant for the first quartile). In 32 out of 41 rooms with mechanical ventilation (78%), the clean air flow was estimated to be below the legal minimum of 25 m3/h/occupant at 100% occupancy. Concentrations in excess of 5,000 ppm were observed in 23 of the 101 rooms equipped with fixed sensors. The proposed method has demonstrated its feasibility in real-life conditions. For the purpose of evaluating the air quality of all rooms affiliated with universities, it is recommended that this method be used in a systematic manner. The findings of this study indicate that a significant proportion of the examined rooms may not be in accordance with the relevant legislation, thereby jeopardizing the health of the occupants. In order to comply with the law, the method proposed here to estimate gauge reduction should be applied.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of large mobile air purifiers on aerosol concentration in classrooms and the reduction of airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 98%
- Experimental Methods of Investigating Airborne Indoor Virus-Transmissions Adapted to Several Ventilation Measures 97%
- SARS-CoV-2 Aerosol Transmission Indoors: A Closer Look at Viral Load, Infectivity, the Effectiveness of Preventive Measures and a Simple Approach for Practical Recommendations 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ventilation during COVID-19 in a school for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) 95%
- Air-liquid interface exposure of A549 human lung cells to characterize the hazard potential of a gaseous bio-hybrid fuel blend 94%
- Impulse dispersion of aerosols during playing wind instruments 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessment of Environmental and Occupational Risk Factors for the Mitigation and Containment of a COVID-19 Outbreak in a Meat Processing Plant 92%
- COVIDHunter: An Accurate, Flexible, and Environment-Aware Open-Source COVID-19 Outbreak Simulation Model 91%
- Providing a safe, in-person, residential college experience during the COVID-19 pandemic 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.