Untying Rates of Gene Gain and Loss Leads to a New Phylogenetic Approach
Dvir, Y.; Snir, S.
Show abstract
The advent of the genomic era has produced an incredible wealth and resolution of molecular data, posing an unprecedented challenge for molecular systematics, necessitating novel techniques and paradigms. Consequently, whole genome approaches were developed to extract the evolutionary signal by taking advantage of a larger amount of data. In parallel and in light of the understanding that in prokaryotes, genome dynamics (GD) events, primarily gene gain and loss, provide a significantly richer signal than point mutations in ubiquitous housekeeping genes, GD-based approaches were suggested. However, proper modeling of these data and the processes generating them has lagged in their pace of accumulation, both because of a lack of deep understanding and because of technical difficulties. Among the central hurdles of accurate modeling of real data is the relaxation of rate constancy, particularly the untying of gain and loss rates. This relaxation violates key assumptions such as constant genome sizes, gene set, and model reversibility and has vast implications for implementation. This work presents a generic stochastic model, the two-ratio process (TRP), which encompasses and deals with these complications. As a special case, it contains the Poissonian process with different gene gain and loss rates as a form of the Birth-Death process with varying population sizes. The lack of reversibility invalidates traditional phylogenetic approaches, yielding a novel two-stage phylogenetic approach in which accurate, bidirectional parameters are first inferred for triplets and later combined by a special cherry-picking method to a complete tree. We show by algebraic techniques that this method is theoretically statistically consistent. The method implemented by the software TDDR (Triplets Directed Distances Reconstruction) was applied to synthetic data, showing an advantage over other approaches handling similar data but without the same model assumption. We also applied it to the Alignable Tight Genomic Clusters (ATGC) Database, which showed a high adequacy to the observed data. The TDDR code is available on GitHub: https://github.com/YoavDvir/TDDR.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Gene Transfer based Phylogenetics: Analytical Expressions and Additivity via Birth/Death Theory 97%
- ConvexML: Fast and accurate branch length estimation under irreversible mutation models, illustrated through applications to CRISPR/Cas9-based lineage tracing 97%
- Optimal Tree Metric Matching Enables Phylogenomic Branch Length Reconciliation 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.