Back

Targeted delivery of mRNA to the heart via extracellular vesicles or lipid nanoparticles

Nawaz, M.; Tangruksa, B.; Heydarkhan-Hagvall, S.; Kohl, F.; Gonzalez-King Garibotti, H.; Jing, Y.; Payandeh, Z.; Reyahi, A.; Jennbacken, K.; Wiseman, J.; Hultin, L.; Lindfors, L.; Synnergren, J.; Valadi, H.

2025-01-26 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.01.25.634881 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Targeted mRNA transport plays a crucial role in enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of the molecule, reducing its side effects, and minimizing off-target effects. Systemic administration of mRNA through lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) or extracellular vesicles (EVs) predominantly results in mRNA accumulation in the liver. We hypothesized that cardiac-specific EVs could more effectively target the transport of mRNA to the heart, in comparison to non-cardiac-specific EVs or LNPs. In mice, after intravenous administration, EVs from cardiac progenitor cells (CPC-EVs) were the most efficient to transport the modified mRNA, encoding vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), to mouse heart, with minimal liver accumulation compared to non-cardiac-specific EVs or LNPs. Additionally, intracardiac injections of CPC-EVs not only demonstrate that they are the most adapted vehicle for interacting with heart tissue, delivering the mRNA to cells, and inducing maximal VEGF-A protein production, but RNA-seq analyses also revealed their minimal impact on overall gene expression, compared to LNPs or non-cardiac-specific EVs. Furthermore, immunofluorescence staining of CD31 and -SMA, markers of microvascular density, showed increased vessel density in mouse aortic rings following the delivery of VEGF-A mRNA via CPC-EVs. These findings suggest that CPC-EVs are superior in mRNA targeting to heart, communication with cardiac cells, and causing minimal transcriptomic changes during VEGF-A mRNA delivery. Therefore, CPC-EVs could be promising vectors for heart-targeted mRNA delivery, potentially reducing liver accumulation.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
64.6%
50% of probability mass above
2
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
3
Journal of Extracellular Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
4
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
5
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
6
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
7
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
8
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
9
Journal of Nanobiotechnology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.2%
11
Pharmaceutics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
12
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
13
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
14
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
15
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
17
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
19
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
21
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%