Back

Applied Machine Learning for human bacteriaMALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry: a systematicreview

Schmidt-Santiago, L.; Guerrero-Lopez, A.; Sevilla-Salcedo, C.; Rodriguez-Temporal, D.; Rodriguez-Sanchez, B.; Gomez-Verdejo, V.

2025-01-28 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.01.25.634879 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Bacterial identification, antimicrobial resistance prediction, and strain typification are critical tasks in clinical microbiology, essential for guiding patient treatment and controlling the spread of infectious diseases. While Machine Learning (ML) has shown immense promise in enhancing MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry applications for these tasks, an up to date comprehensive review from a ML perspective is currently lacking. To address this gap, we systematically reviewed 93 studies published between 2004 and 2024, focusing on key ML aspects such as data size and balance, pre-processing pipelines, model selection and evaluation, open-source data and code availability. Our analysis highlights the predominant use of classical ML models like Random Forest and Support Vector Machines, alongside emerging interest in Deep Learning approaches for handling complex, high-dimensional data. Despite significant progress, challenges such as inconsistent preprocessing workflows, reliance on black-box models, limited external validation, and insufficient open-source resources persist, hindering transparency, reproducibility, and broader adoption. This review offers actionable insights to enhance ML-driven bacterial diagnostics, advocating for standardized methodologies, greater transparency, and improved data accessibility. In addition, we provide guidelines on how to approach ML for MALDI-TOF analysis, helping researchers navigate key decisions in model development and evaluation.

Published in Briefings in Bioinformatics (predicted rank #4) · training set

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.