Back

Aberrant Modular Dynamics of Functional Networks in Schizophrenia and Their Relationship with Neurotransmitter and Gene Expression Profiles

Zhen, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Zheng, Z.; Zheng, H.; Tang, S.

2025-01-27 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.01.25.634845 bioRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionNumerous studies have emphasized the time-varying modular architecture of functional brain networks and its relevance to cognitive functions in healthy participants. However, how brain modular dynamics change in schizophrenia and how these alterations relate to neurotransmitter and transcriptomic signatures have not been well elucidated. MethodsWe harmonized resting-state fMRI data from a multi-site sample including 223 patients and 279 healthy controls and applied the multilayer network method to estimate the regional module switching rate (flexibility) of functional brain connectomes. We examined aberrant flexibility in patients relative to controls and explored its relations to neurotransmitter systems and postmortem gene expression. ResultsCompared with controls, patients with schizophrenia had significantly higher flexibility in the somatomotor and right visual regions, and lower flexibility in the left parahippocampal gyrus, right supramarginal gyrus, right frontal-operculum-insula, bilateral precuneus posterior cingulate cortex, and bilateral inferior parietal gyrus. These alterations were associated with multiple neurotransmitter systems and weighted gene transcriptomic profiles. The most relevant genes were preferentially enriched for biological processes of transmembrane transport and brain development, specific cell types, and previously identified schizophrenia-related genes. ConclusionsThis study reveals aberrant modular dynamics in schizophrenia and its relations to neurotransmitter systems and schizophrenia-related transcriptomic profiles, providing insights into the understanding of the pathophysiology underlying schizophrenia.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.