AI regulation in healthcare around the world: what is the status quo?
Busch, F.; Geis, R.; Wang, Y.-C.; Kather, J. N.; Khori, N. A.; Makowski, M. R.; Kolawole, I. K.; Truhn, D.; Clements, W.; Gilbert, S.; Adams, L. C.; Ortiz-Prado, E.; Bressem, K. K.
Show abstract
The rapid adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) raises challenges related to ethics, safety, equity, and governance that require robust regulatory frameworks. In most jurisdictions, AI-driven medical devices are already covered by existing medical device frameworks, although new AI-specific legislation may be required to address the challenges posed by recent advancements. This expert review focuses on frameworks and legislation explicitly tailored to AI, synthesizing research literature, government and intergovernmental framework programs, and online media coverage to provide an up-to-date assessment of global AI-specific regulation or strategies in healthcare as of December 2024. Our findings show that only 15.2% (n=30/197) of countries or territories have enacted legally binding AI-specific legislation, including the 27 member states of the European Union (EU) following the adoption of the EU AI Act. A further 9.1% (n=18/197) have drafted legislation, and 28.4% (n=56/197) have issued non-binding guidelines. Notably, 47.2% (n=93/197) of countries or territories do not have an AI-specific framework or legislation in place. Furthermore, our results highlight disparities between the Global North and South, with 60.3% (n=82/136) of Global South countries or territories lacking frameworks or legislation, compared to 18% (n=11/61) in the Global North. In conclusion, our work provides an overview of the status quo of AI regulation around the world, highlights disparities in the adoption of frameworks and legislation, and calls for the need for intergovernmental and regional cooperation.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- AI-Driven Early Detection of Severe Influenza in Jiangsu, China: A Deep Learning Model Validated Through The Design of Multi-Center Clinical Trials and Prospective Real-World Deployment 89%
- Stay-at-home and face mask policies intentions inconsistent with incidence and fatality during US COVID-19 pandemic 88%
- Lifestyle acquired immunity, decentralized intelligent infrastructures and revised healthcare expenditures may limit pandemic catastrophe: a lesson from COVID-19 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sunshine on KOL : a retrospective study about financial ties between medical key opinion leaders and pharmaceutical industry in France 90%
- Online information on face masks in Italian and English websites: deficiencies and responsibilities of search engines 89%
- Protocol for Project Recovery: Cardiac Surgery - Leveraging Digital Platform for Efficient Collection of Longitudinal Patient-Reported Outcome Data Towards Improving Postoperative Recovery 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cracking the Code: A Scoping Review to Unite Disciplines in Tackling Legal Issues in Health Artificial Intelligence 94%
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 88%
- Natural Language Word-Embeddings as a glimpse into healthcare at the End Of Life 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of COVID-19 Second Wave on Healthcare Networks in the United States 90%
- ChatGPT- versus human-generated answers to frequently asked questions about diabetes: a Turing test-inspired survey among employees of a Danish diabetes center 90%
- Towards a COVID-19 symptom triad: The importance of symptom constellations in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.