Back

Evaluating Seqstant LiveGene Analysis in Real-Time Assessment of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (mNGS) Data from Respiratory Samples

Boutin, S.; Klein, S.; Untergasser, G.; Loka, T. P.; Jakob, S.; Khatamzas, E.; Wrettos, G.; Knobloch, H.; Nurjadi, D.

2025-01-28 microbiology
10.1101/2025.01.24.634829 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe detection of pathogens causing infections by conventional diagnostic methods can be challenging and next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology offers a promising alternative method. In this study, we evaluated the performance of real-time metagenomic next-generation sequencing (rt-mNGS) for the detection of pathogens in respiratory samples. MethodWe used rt-mNGS, using the Seqstant LiveGene Analysis platform, on 335 respiratory samples in comparison to conventional culture results. ResultsWe observed an overall good concordance in 71.64% (240/335) of the methods. The rt-mNGS outperformed the gold standard culture in 16.12% (54/335) of the samples, while the culture was superior in detecting the clinically relevant pathogen in 12.24% (41/335) of the samples. The non-inferiority of rt-mNGS was statistically significant ({delta} = 10, = 0.05, 1 - {beta}= 0.8). We also observed that the real-time analysis of NGS data is beneficial in obtaining reliable timely results as the initial report at cycle 46 exhibits a Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of 93.75% at the species-level with a sensitivity of 32.09%. ConclusionOverall, our study showed the non-inferiority of rt-mNGS compared to the standard-of-care microbiology for respiratory samples with statistical significance. Moreover, the rt-mNGS method exhibited superior sensitivity and superior overall performance. It also uniquely detected certain organisms that are typically hard to culture. However, rt-mNGS reported a higher number of false positives and faced limitations in detecting Aspergillus spp. In conclusion, the study highlights the potential of rt-mNGS as a powerful tool in clinical diagnostics of respiratory infections and beyond.

Published in Infection (predicted rank #16) · training set

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.