Back

Genome assembly of Bougainvillia cf. muscus (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa)

Macias-Munoz, A.; Varney, R.; Katcher, E.; Everhart, M.; Oakley, T. H.

2025-01-27 genomics
10.1101/2025.01.24.634790 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAs one of just a handful of non-Bilaterian animal phyla, Cnidaria are key to understanding genome evolution across Metazoa. Despite their importance and diversity, the genomes of most species in the phylum are unsequenced, due in large part to difficulties cultivating them in a laboratory. Here, we present a genome sequence of Bougainvillia cf. mucus, a hydrozoan with four marginal bulbs each containing seven simple eyes (ocelli). This species appeared in our tanks from contamination. While we lacked sufficient samples for transcriptomic or functional studies, we were able to expand our knowledge of how the genome of this species compares to the few, better studied members of hydrozoans by investigating synteny to other cnidarians, repetitive element content, and phylogenetics and synteny of vision-related genes in this eyed species compared to eyeless relatives. ResultsThe genome sequence consists of 350 contigs with an N50 of 10 Mb, a total genome length of 375.328 Mb, a BUSCO score of 90.1%, and predicted protein coding genes totaling 46,431. We found a high degree of macrosynteny conservation with Hydra vulgaris and Hydractinia symbiolongicarpus. Repetitive elements make up 62% of this Bougainvillia genome. For vision-related genes, we identified 20 cnidarian opsins (cnidops) in Bougainvillia and found instances of gene duplication and loss in families associated with bilaterian eye development, phototransduction, and visual cycling. ConclusionsThis high-quality, contiguous genome in an eyed Hydrozoan will be a valuable resource for additional comparative genomic studies.

Published in G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.