Back

Fast tumor phylogeny regression via tree-structured dual dynamic programming

Schmidt, H.; Qi, Y.; Raphael, B.; El-Kebir, M.

2025-01-27 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.01.24.634761 bioRxiv
Show abstract

MotivationReconstructing the evolutionary history of tumors from bulk DNA sequencing of multiple tissue samples remains a challenging computational problem, requiring simultaneous deconvolution of the tumor tissue and inference of its evolutionary history. Recently, phylogenetic reconstruction methods have made significant progress by breaking the reconstruction problem into two parts: a regression problem over a fixed topology and a search over tree space. While effective techniques have been developed for the latter search problem, the regression problem remains a bottleneck in both method design and implementation due to the lack of fast, specialized algorithms. ResultsHere, we introduce fastppm, a fast tool to solve the regression problem via tree-structured dual dynamic programming. fastppm supports arbitrary, separable convex loss functions including the{ell} 2, piecewise linear, binomial and beta-binomial loss and provides asymptotic improvements for the{ell} 2 and piecewise linear loss over existing algorithms. We find that fastppm empirically outperforms both specialized and general purpose regression algorithms, obtaining 50-450x speedups while providing as accurate solutions as existing approaches. Incorporating fastppm into several phylogeny inference algorithms immediately yields up to 400x speedups, requiring only a small change to the program code of existing software. Finally, fastppm enables analysis of low-coverage bulk DNA sequencing data on both simulated data and in a patient-derived mouse model of colorectal cancer, outperforming state-of-the-art phylogeny inference algorithms in terms of both accuracy and runtime. Availabilityfastppm is implemented in C++ and available as both a command-line interface and Python library at github.com/elkebir-group/fastppm.git.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.