Back

Caudata macrogenetics: Species range size predicts intraspecific genetic variation in global salamanders

Amador, L.; Wiley, D. L. F.; Arroyo-Torres, I.; McDaniels, C. X.; Rosario-Sanchez, E. O.; Farmer, H.; Bradley, H.; Erdmann, J.; Pelletier, T. A.; Barrow, L. N.

2025-01-27 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2025.01.24.634750 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AimGenetic diversity contains valuable information about ecological and evolutionary aspects of species. Intraspecific genetic variation is shaped by species natural history traits and by characteristics of geography and climate within their ranges. Amphibians are of ecological and conservation interest because of their global distribution, deep history, trait diversity, and roles within ecological communities. Here, we studied genetic variation within salamanders to investigate predictors of nucleotide diversity and spatial patterns of genetic differentiation. LocationGlobal. Time PeriodPresent. Major Taxa StudiedSalamanders. MethodsWe repurposed mitochondrial DNA sequences and ecological data from open-access databases for 220 salamander species. We calculated nucleotide diversity ({pi}) and tested for isolation by distance (IBD) and isolation by environment (IBE). We analyzed these three variables with random forest and phylogenetic comparative methods using 28 predictors expected to be associated with genetic variation. ResultsWe recovered 8,108 Cytb sequences with their associated geographic coordinates, of which 7,007 sequences were manually curated by us. Range size, lineage age, and sample size were important predictors of genetic variation. We found higher diversity in regions including the Neotropics and central-eastern Europe. The absence of phylogenetic signal in {pi}, IBD, and IBE suggests that genetic variation is shaped by local ecological and geographical factors rather than by shared ancestry. Main ConclusionsOur finding of range size as an important predictor aligns with theoretical expectations that species with larger ranges tend to harbor more genetic diversity. Furthermore, lineage age being an important predictor is in line with the clade-age hypothesis, in which species with longer divergence times have higher genetic diversity because they have had more time to accumulate genetic variation. Our results underscore the importance of integrating spatial data into macrogenetic studies, providing valuable information for future studies and conservation strategies targeting regions with high or low genetic diversity.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.1%
2
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
12.1%
3
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
4
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.3%
5
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
9
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
10
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Journal of Heredity
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
12
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
13
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
15
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
19
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.3%
21
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
22
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
23
Heredity
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
24
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
25
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
27
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
29
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
61 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%