Phenotypic integration of post-germination traits in Quercus suber: morphological development is mediated by acorn mass; leaf physiology by populations aridity.
Vicente, E.; Carme, M.; Costa e Silva, F.; Stiti, B.; Vizcaino Palomar, N.; Benito Garzon, M.
Show abstract
Background and AimsAssessing intra-specific trait covariation across populations is essential to understand species adaptive responses to climatic variation. However, in tree species, this is understudied for early-life stages despite they are more vulnerable to environmental changes and that climatic adaptations can differ between tree ages. In this paper, we studied the integrated phenotype of Quercus suber during the months following germination. For that, we studied the covariation of key traits involved in seedlings water and C economies along a gradient of aridity at seed origin. MethodsWe performed a provenance trial with 157 Q. suber seedlings originating from 7 different populations across the species distribution. The seedlings were germinated and grown during 4 months under common conditions. Acorn mass along with 11 above- and below-ground traits involved in water and C use were measured. Their covariation in response to aridity at seed origin was analyzed using structural equation modelling (SEM). The variation of individual traits to increasing aridity and the mediation of acorn mass was also tested. Key ResultsSeedlings from arid populations displayed higher leaf evaporative demand coupled with a greater root water uptake capacity. Their leaf physiology also depicted a greater C acquisition capacity, strongly linked to traits conferring drought and heat tolerance. The development of above- and below-ground tissues responded mainly to acorn mass, whereas leaf physiology variations were associated to populations aridity. ConclusionsDry-origin seedlings display a more acquisitive strategy at the whole-plant level compared with seedlings from mesic provenances. This allows a greater water and carbon uptake capacities following germination, which is critical for their survival during their first summer. Leaf physiology adjustments to populations climate contrasts with its plasticity observed by other studies addressing juvenile trees, highlighting Q. suber varying adaptive strategies at different life stages.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Elevated CO2, Warming and Drought Differentially Impact Reproductive and Vegetative Economic Traits in Two Grassland Species 96%
- Comparative anatomy of leaf petioles in temperate trees and shrubs 96%
- Drought tolerance of Hakea species (Proteaceae) from a range of biomes and life-histories predicted by climatic niche. 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Contrasting response of two Lotus corniculatus L. accessions to combined waterlogging-saline stress 94%
- A dynamic epigenetic perspective on above and below-ground phenotypic responses to drought: insights from global DNA methylation in Erodium cicutarium 94%
- Accuracy of the pneumatic method for estimating xylem vulnerability to embolism in temperate diffuse-porous tree species 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Soil variation response is mediated by growth trajectories rather than functional traits in a widespread pioneer Neotropical tree 96%
- Interplay between fecundity, sexual and growth selection on the spring phenology of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). 94%
- Natural variation in chalcone isomerase defines a major locus controlling radial stem growth variation among Populus nigra populations 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adaptations and responses of the common dandelion to low atmospheric pressure in high altitude environments 95%
- Functional traits and soil water availability shape competitive interactions in a diploid-polyploid complex 94%
- Competitive asymmetry confers polyploid advantage under environmental stress 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.