Back

Assembly, Annotation, and Comparative Analysis of the Mitochondrial Genome of Winged Bean (Psophocarpus tetragonolobus): Insights into Evolutionary Adaptation and Codon Usage Bias

Singh, N. K.; Singh, B. K.; Kumar, P.; Pandey, A.; Kumar, S.; Bishi, S. K.; Pattynayak, A.; Bhadana, V. P.; Rakishit, S.; Tribhuvan, K. U.

2025-01-27 genomics
10.1101/2025.01.24.634632 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The winged bean (Psophocarpus tetragonolobus) is an underutilized, nutritionally dense legume with significant agricultural potential due to its adaptability to tropical environments and nitrogen-fixing capabilities. This study presents the assembly, annotation, and comparative analysis of its complete mitochondrial genome, spanning 366,925 bp. The genome comprises 64 genes, including 38 protein-coding genes, 12 tRNA genes, and 6 rRNA genes. Codon usage analysis revealed moderate bias in mitochondrial genes, primarily shaped by mutational pressures, while tRNA gene content aligns with codon preferences, optimizing translational efficiency. Phylogenetic analysis placed P. tetragonolobus within the Phaseoleae tribe, clustering closely with Glycine max and Vigna radiata, while synteny analysis highlighted high genomic conservation with related legumes. Ka/Ks ratio analysis underscored strong purifying selection in core mitochondrial genes, reflecting functional constraints essential for energy metabolism. Comparative analyses of mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes revealed distinct evolutionary pressures, with chloroplast genes exhibiting more significant variability influenced by functional roles in photosynthesis. These findings provide valuable insights into the evolution and adaptation of P. tetragonolobus, establishing a foundation for its potential application in sustainable agriculture and crop improvement programs.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.