Back

fCUT&Tag-seq: An Optimized CUT&Tag-based Method for High-Resolution Histone Modification and Chromatin-Binding Protein Profiling in both Model and Plant Pathogenic Fungi

Wang, H.; Tan, Y.; Ma, J.; Yang, J.; Liu, M.; Lu, S.; Xia, H.; Tang, G.; Liu, W.; Guo, H.-S.; Shan, C.

2025-01-24 microbiology
10.1101/2025.01.23.634238 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Histone modifications and chromatin-binding proteins play crucial roles in regulating gene expression in eukaryotes, with significant implications for fungal pathogenicity and development. However, profiling these modifications or proteins across the genome in fungi remains challenging due to the technical limitations of the traditional, widely used ChIP-Seq method. Here, we present an optimized CUT&Tag-Seq protocol (fCUT&Tag-Seq) specifically designed for filamentous fungi and dimorphic fungi. Our approach involves the preparation of protoplasts and nuclear extraction to enhance antibody accessibility, along with formaldehyde crosslinking to improve protein-DNA binding efficiency. We then successfully applied fCUT&Tag-Seq to accurately profile multiple histone modifications like H3K9me3, H3K27me3, H3K4me3, and H3K18ac, across different plant pathogenic or model fungal species, including Verticillium dahliae, Neurospora crassa, Fusarium graminearum, and Sporisorium scitamineum, showing good signal-to-noise ratios, reproducibility, and detection sensitivity. Furthermore, we extended this method to profile chromatin-binding proteins, such as the histone acetyltransferase Gcn5. This study establishes fCUT&Tag-Seq as a robust and useful tool for fungal epigenetic research, enabling detailed exploration of chromatin dynamics and advancing our understanding of fungal gene regulation, development, and pathogenicity. Impact StatementWe developed a faster, lowLJinput method to study how genes are turned on and off in fungi, even in tough species that are difficult to analyze with standard methods. Our new approach, named fCUT&Tag-Seq, requires only 10,000 cells and can be completed in just two days. It delivers clearer, more reliable results and has already been successfully applied to multiple fungi, including crop pathogens. By revealing the molecular "control switches" that govern fungal development and virulence, we expect it will accelerate basic research and help identify new targets for controlling destructive plant diseases.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
12.6%
2
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.8%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
3.9%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
6
Journal of Fungi
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
8
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
9
Fungal Genetics and Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
10
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
11
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
12
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.9%
13
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Epigenetics & Chromatin
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
15
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
16
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
17
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
19
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
20
Molecular Plant Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
21
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
22
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
23
Yeast
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
24
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.2%
25
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
26
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
27
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.1%
28
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
29
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
30
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%